Title:Classical models are a better explanation of the Jiuzhang Gaussian Boson Samplers than their targeted squeezed light models

Abstract:Recently, Zhong et al. [Science 370, 1460 (2020), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180502 (2021)] performed landmark Gaussian boson sampling experiments with up to 144 modes using threshold detectors. The authors claim to have achieved quantum computational advantage with the implementation of these experiments, named Jiuzhang 1.0 and Jiuzhang 2.0. Their experimental results are validated against several classical hypotheses and adversaries using tests such as the comparison of statistical correlations between modes, Bayesian hypothesis testing and the Heavy Output Generation test. In this work we propose an alternative classical hypothesis for the validation of these experiments. We use the probability distribution of mixtures of coherent states sent into a lossy interferometer; these input mixed states, which we term squashed states, have vacuum fluctuations in one quadrature and excess fluctuations in the other. We find that for configurations in the large photon number density regime, the comparison of statistical correlations does not tell apart the ground truth of the experiment (namely, the probability distribution of two-mode squeezed states sent into a lossy interferometer) from our alternative hypothesis. Moreover, the Bayesian test indicates that our alternative hypothesis is a more likely explanation of the experimental data than the ground truth. Our results indicate that a classical explanation of the experiments of Zhong et al., lacking any quantum features, has not been ruled out.