Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:2207.10058

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:2207.10058 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 20 Jul 2022 (v1), last revised 30 Jul 2023 (this version, v6)]

Title:Classical models may be a better explanation of the Jiuzhang 1.0 Gaussian Boson Sampler than its targeted squeezed light model

Authors:Javier Martínez-Cifuentes, K. M. Fonseca-Romero, Nicolás Quesada
View a PDF of the paper titled Classical models may be a better explanation of the Jiuzhang 1.0 Gaussian Boson Sampler than its targeted squeezed light model, by Javier Mart\'inez-Cifuentes and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Recently, Zhong et al. performed landmark Gaussian boson sampling experiments with up to 144 modes using threshold detectors. The authors claim to have achieved quantum computational advantage with the implementation of these experiments, named Jiuzhang 1.0 and Jiuzhang 2.0. Their experimental results are validated against several classical hypotheses and adversaries using tests such as the comparison of statistical correlations between modes, Bayesian hypothesis testing and the Heavy Output Generation (HOG) test. We propose an alternative classical hypothesis for the validation of these experiments using the probability distribution of mixtures of coherent states sent into a lossy interferometer; these input mixed states, which we term squashed states, have vacuum fluctuations in one quadrature and excess fluctuations in the other. We find that for configurations in the high photon number density regime, the comparison of statistical correlations does not tell apart the ground truth of the experiment (two-mode squeezed states sent into an interferometer) from our alternative hypothesis. The Bayesian test indicates that, for all configurations excepting Jiuzhang 1.0, the ground truth is a more likely explanation of the experimental data than our alternative hypothesis. A similar result is obtained for the HOG test: for all configurations of Jiuzhang 2.0, the test indicates that the experimental samples have higher ground truth probability than the samples obtained form our alternative distribution; for Jiuzhang 1.0 the test is inconclusive. Our results provide a new hypothesis that should be considered in the validation of future GBS experiments, and shed light into the need to identify proper metrics to verify quantum advantage in the context of GBS. They also indicate that a classical explanation of the Jiuzhang 1.0 experiment, lacking any quantum features, has not been ruled out.
Comments: The code used to calculate threshold probabilities can be found in the repository this https URL polyquantique/torontonian-julia . All the data used in the computation of the validation tests is available upon reasonable request, or at this https URL
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2207.10058 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2207.10058v6 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.10058
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Quantum 7, 1076 (2023)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-08-08-1076
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Nicolás Quesada [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:39:44 UTC (804 KB)
[v2] Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:59:46 UTC (804 KB)
[v3] Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:01:46 UTC (395 KB)
[v4] Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:26:35 UTC (395 KB)
[v5] Wed, 26 Jul 2023 11:27:12 UTC (416 KB)
[v6] Sun, 30 Jul 2023 03:44:08 UTC (416 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Classical models may be a better explanation of the Jiuzhang 1.0 Gaussian Boson Sampler than its targeted squeezed light model, by Javier Mart\'inez-Cifuentes and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-07

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack