Can Neural Networks Bridge the Gap Between Lagrangian Mesh-Free Methods and High-Order Interpolants?
Authors:
Lucas Gerken Starepravo,
Georgios Fourtakas,
Steven Lind,
Ajay Harish,
Jack R. C. King
Abstract:
Mesh-free numerical methods offer flexibility in discretising complex geometries, showing potential where mesh-based methods struggle. While high-order approximations can be obtained via consistency correction using linear systems, they remain prohibitively expensive in Lagrangian formulations, which often exhibit low-order convergence. Here, we explore the use of machine learning (ML) to bridge t…
▽ More
Mesh-free numerical methods offer flexibility in discretising complex geometries, showing potential where mesh-based methods struggle. While high-order approximations can be obtained via consistency correction using linear systems, they remain prohibitively expensive in Lagrangian formulations, which often exhibit low-order convergence. Here, we explore the use of machine learning (ML) to bridge the gap between mesh-free Lagrangian simulations and high-order approximations. We develop strategies to couple data-driven models, in particular multilayer perceptrons and residual MLPs with the Local Anisotropic Basis Function Method (LABFM), as an exemplar high-order mesh-free method. In the first strategy, we use neural networks to surrogate the high-order kernel; in the second, we develop surrogate models for computing the solutions of dense, low-rank linear systems present in high-order mesh-free methods. Results from networks aimed at predicting support nodal weights yield a qualitative match with validation data, but fall short in eliminating lower-order errors due to inaccuracies in the ML-computed weights, and thus leading to divergent behaviour. Regarding the second strategy, the ML-computed solution vector generates residuals with mean absolute errors of $\mathcal{O}(10^{-5})$. However, convergence studies reveal this level of accuracy to be insufficient, causing derivative operators to diverge at a lower resolution and achieve a lower accuracy than LABFM theoretically allows. Furthermore, there is marginal computational gain when computing the solution vector with neural networks compared to LU factorisation. These findings indicate that insufficient accuracy challenges both using neural networks as surrogates for high-order kernels and solve ill-conditioned linear systems, while the additional high computational cost systems further limits the latter's practicality.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2025; v1 submitted 29 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
