Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2503.23230

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Computational Physics

arXiv:2503.23230 (physics)
[Submitted on 29 Mar 2025 (v1), last revised 17 Apr 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Can Neural Networks Bridge the Gap Between Lagrangian Mesh-Free Methods and High-Order Interpolants?

Authors:Lucas Gerken Starepravo, Georgios Fourtakas, Steven Lind, Ajay Harish, Jack R. C. King
View a PDF of the paper titled Can Neural Networks Bridge the Gap Between Lagrangian Mesh-Free Methods and High-Order Interpolants?, by Lucas Gerken Starepravo and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Mesh-free numerical methods offer flexibility in discretising complex geometries, showing potential where mesh-based methods struggle. While high-order approximations can be obtained via consistency correction using linear systems, they remain prohibitively expensive in Lagrangian formulations, which often exhibit low-order convergence. Here, we explore the use of machine learning (ML) to bridge the gap between mesh-free Lagrangian simulations and high-order approximations. We develop strategies to couple data-driven models, in particular multilayer perceptrons and residual MLPs with the Local Anisotropic Basis Function Method (LABFM), as an exemplar high-order mesh-free method. In the first strategy, we use neural networks to surrogate the high-order kernel; in the second, we develop surrogate models for computing the solutions of dense, low-rank linear systems present in high-order mesh-free methods. Results from networks aimed at predicting support nodal weights yield a qualitative match with validation data, but fall short in eliminating lower-order errors due to inaccuracies in the ML-computed weights, and thus leading to divergent behaviour. Regarding the second strategy, the ML-computed solution vector generates residuals with mean absolute errors of $\mathcal{O}(10^{-5})$. However, convergence studies reveal this level of accuracy to be insufficient, causing derivative operators to diverge at a lower resolution and achieve a lower accuracy than LABFM theoretically allows. Furthermore, there is marginal computational gain when computing the solution vector with neural networks compared to LU factorisation. These findings indicate that insufficient accuracy challenges both using neural networks as surrogates for high-order kernels and solve ill-conditioned linear systems, while the additional high computational cost systems further limits the latter's practicality.
Subjects: Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2503.23230 [physics.comp-ph]
  (or arXiv:2503.23230v2 [physics.comp-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23230
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Lucas Gerken Starepravo [view email]
[v1] Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:29:01 UTC (3,021 KB)
[v2] Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:52:36 UTC (2,606 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Can Neural Networks Bridge the Gap Between Lagrangian Mesh-Free Methods and High-Order Interpolants?, by Lucas Gerken Starepravo and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.comp-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-03
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack