Does prior knowledge in the form of multiple low-dose PET images (at different dose levels) improve standard-dose PET prediction?
Authors:
Behnoush Sanaei,
Reza Faghihi,
Hossein Arabi
Abstract:
Reducing the injected dose would result in quality degradation and loss of information in PET imaging. To address this issue, deep learning methods have been introduced to predict standard PET images (S-PET) from the corresponding low-dose versions (L-PET). The existing deep learning-based denoising methods solely rely on a single dose level of PET images to predict the S-PET images. In this work,…
▽ More
Reducing the injected dose would result in quality degradation and loss of information in PET imaging. To address this issue, deep learning methods have been introduced to predict standard PET images (S-PET) from the corresponding low-dose versions (L-PET). The existing deep learning-based denoising methods solely rely on a single dose level of PET images to predict the S-PET images. In this work, we proposed to exploit the prior knowledge in the form of multiple low-dose levels of PET images (in addition to the target low-dose level) to estimate the S-PET images.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
Quantitative investigation of low-dose PET imaging and post-reconstruction smoothing
Authors:
Behnoush Sanaei,
Reza Faghihi,
Hossein Arabi
Abstract:
In this study, 18F-FDG PET/CT brain scans of 50 patients with head and neck malignant lesions were employed to systematically assess the relationship between the amount of injected dose (10%, 8%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, and 1% of standard dose) and the image quality through measuring standard image quality metrics (peak-signal-to-noise-ration (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), root mean squar…
▽ More
In this study, 18F-FDG PET/CT brain scans of 50 patients with head and neck malignant lesions were employed to systematically assess the relationship between the amount of injected dose (10%, 8%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, and 1% of standard dose) and the image quality through measuring standard image quality metrics (peak-signal-to-noise-ration (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), and standard uptake value (SUV) bias) for the whole head region as well as within the malignant lesions, considering the standard-dose PET images as reference. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of post-reconstruction Gaussian filtering on the PET images in order to reduce noise and improve the signal-to-noise ratio at different low-dose levels. Significant degradation of PET image quality and tumor detectability was observed with a decrease in the injected dose by more than 5%, leading to a remarkable increase in RMSE from 0.173 SUV (at 5%) to 1.454 SUV (at 1%). The quantitative investigation of the malignant lesions demonstrated that SUVmax bias greatly increased in low-dose PET images (in particular at 1%, 2%, 3% levels) before applying the post-reconstruction filter, while applying the Gaussian filter on low-dose PET images led to a significant reduction in SUVmax bias. The SUVmean bias within the malignant lesions was negligible (less than 1%) in low-dose PET images; however, this bias increased significantly after applying the post-reconstruction filter. In conclusion, it is strongly recommended that the SUVmax bias and SUVmean bias in low-dose PET images should be considered prior to and following the application of the post-reconstruction Guassain filter, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
