Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2103.10541

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2103.10541 (physics)
[Submitted on 18 Mar 2021]

Title:Quantitative investigation of low-dose PET imaging and post-reconstruction smoothing

Authors:Behnoush Sanaei, Reza Faghihi, Hossein Arabi
View a PDF of the paper titled Quantitative investigation of low-dose PET imaging and post-reconstruction smoothing, by Behnoush Sanaei and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In this study, 18F-FDG PET/CT brain scans of 50 patients with head and neck malignant lesions were employed to systematically assess the relationship between the amount of injected dose (10%, 8%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, and 1% of standard dose) and the image quality through measuring standard image quality metrics (peak-signal-to-noise-ration (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), and standard uptake value (SUV) bias) for the whole head region as well as within the malignant lesions, considering the standard-dose PET images as reference. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of post-reconstruction Gaussian filtering on the PET images in order to reduce noise and improve the signal-to-noise ratio at different low-dose levels. Significant degradation of PET image quality and tumor detectability was observed with a decrease in the injected dose by more than 5%, leading to a remarkable increase in RMSE from 0.173 SUV (at 5%) to 1.454 SUV (at 1%). The quantitative investigation of the malignant lesions demonstrated that SUVmax bias greatly increased in low-dose PET images (in particular at 1%, 2%, 3% levels) before applying the post-reconstruction filter, while applying the Gaussian filter on low-dose PET images led to a significant reduction in SUVmax bias. The SUVmean bias within the malignant lesions was negligible (less than 1%) in low-dose PET images; however, this bias increased significantly after applying the post-reconstruction filter. In conclusion, it is strongly recommended that the SUVmax bias and SUVmean bias in low-dose PET images should be considered prior to and following the application of the post-reconstruction Guassain filter, respectively.
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2103.10541 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2103.10541v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.10541
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hossein Arabi [view email]
[v1] Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:51:58 UTC (1,158 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Quantitative investigation of low-dose PET imaging and post-reconstruction smoothing, by Behnoush Sanaei and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-03
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack