-
Roadmap on Advancements of the FHI-aims Software Package
Authors:
Joseph W. Abbott,
Carlos Mera Acosta,
Alaa Akkoush,
Alberto Ambrosetti,
Viktor Atalla,
Alexej Bagrets,
Jörg Behler,
Daniel Berger,
Björn Bieniek,
Jonas Björk,
Volker Blum,
Saeed Bohloul,
Connor L. Box,
Nicholas Boyer,
Danilo Simoes Brambila,
Gabriel A. Bramley,
Kyle R. Bryenton,
María Camarasa-Gómez,
Christian Carbogno,
Fabio Caruso,
Sucismita Chutia,
Michele Ceriotti,
Gábor Csányi,
William Dawson,
Francisco A. Delesma
, et al. (177 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Electronic-structure theory is the foundation of the description of materials including multiscale modeling of their properties and functions. Obviously, without sufficient accuracy at the base, reliable predictions are unlikely at any level that follows. The software package FHI-aims has proven to be a game changer for accurate free-energy calculations because of its scalability, numerical precis…
▽ More
Electronic-structure theory is the foundation of the description of materials including multiscale modeling of their properties and functions. Obviously, without sufficient accuracy at the base, reliable predictions are unlikely at any level that follows. The software package FHI-aims has proven to be a game changer for accurate free-energy calculations because of its scalability, numerical precision, and its efficient handling of density functional theory (DFT) with hybrid functionals and van der Waals interactions. It treats molecules, clusters, and extended systems (solids and liquids) on an equal footing. Besides DFT, FHI-aims also includes quantum-chemistry methods, descriptions for excited states and vibrations, and calculations of various types of transport. Recent advancements address the integration of FHI-aims into an increasing number of workflows and various artificial intelligence (AI) methods. This Roadmap describes the state-of-the-art of FHI-aims and advancements that are currently ongoing or planned.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2025; v1 submitted 30 April, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Precision benchmarks for solids: G0W0 calculations with different basis sets
Authors:
Maryam Azizi,
Francisco A. Delesma,
Matteo Giantomassi,
Davis Zavickis,
Mikael Kuisma,
Kristian Thyghesen,
Dorothea Golze,
Alexander Buccheri,
Min-Ye Zhang,
Patrick Rinke,
Claudia Draxl,
Andris Gulans,
Xavier Gonze
Abstract:
The GW approximation within many-body perturbation theory is the state of the art for computing quasiparticle energies in solids. Typically, Kohn-Sham (KS) eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, obtained from a Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation are used as a starting point to build the Green's function G and the screened Coulomb interaction W, yielding the one-shot G0W0 selfenergy if no further…
▽ More
The GW approximation within many-body perturbation theory is the state of the art for computing quasiparticle energies in solids. Typically, Kohn-Sham (KS) eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, obtained from a Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation are used as a starting point to build the Green's function G and the screened Coulomb interaction W, yielding the one-shot G0W0 selfenergy if no further update of these quantities are made. Multiple implementations exist for both the DFT and the subsequent G0W0 calculation, leading to possible differences in quasiparticle energies. In the present work, the G0W0 quasiparticle energies for states close to the band gap are calculated for six crystalline solids, using four different codes: Abinit, exciting, FHI-aims, and GPAW. This comparison helps to assess the impact of basis-set types (planewaves versus localized orbitals) and the treatment of core and valence electrons (all-electron full potentials versus pseudopotentials). The impact of unoccupied states as well as the algorithms for solving the quasiparticle equation are also briefly discussed. For the KS-DFT band gaps, we observe good agreement between all codes, with differences not exceeding 0.1 eV, while the G0W0 results deviate on the order of 0.1-0.3 eV. Between all-electron codes (FHI-aims and exciting), the agreement is better than 15 meV for KS-DFT and, with one exception, about 0.1 eV for G0W0 band gaps.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Validation of the GreenX library time-frequency component for efficient GW and RPA calculations
Authors:
Maryam Azizi,
Jan Wilhelm,
Dorothea Golze,
Francisco A. Delesma,
Ramón L. Panadés-Barrueta,
Patrick Rinke,
Matteo Giantomassi,
Xavier Gonze
Abstract:
Electronic structure calculations based on many-body perturbation theory (e.g. GW or the random-phase approximation (RPA)) require function evaluations in the complex time and frequency domain, for example inhomogeneous Fourier transforms or analytic continuation from the imaginary axis to the real axis. For inhomogeneous Fourier transforms, the time-frequency component of the GreenX library provi…
▽ More
Electronic structure calculations based on many-body perturbation theory (e.g. GW or the random-phase approximation (RPA)) require function evaluations in the complex time and frequency domain, for example inhomogeneous Fourier transforms or analytic continuation from the imaginary axis to the real axis. For inhomogeneous Fourier transforms, the time-frequency component of the GreenX library provides time-frequency grids that can be utilized in low-scaling RPA and GW implementations. In addition, the adoption of the compact frequency grids provided by our library also reduces the computational overhead in RPA implementations with conventional scaling. In this work, we present low-scaling GW and conventional RPA benchmark calculations using the GreenX grids with different codes (FHI-aims, CP2K and ABINIT) for molecules, two-dimensional materials and solids. Very small integration errors are observed when using 30 time-frequency points for our test cases, namely $<10^{-8}$ eV/electron for the RPA correlation energies, and 10 meV for the GW quasiparticle energies.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2024; v1 submitted 11 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
