Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:2411.19701

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Materials Science

arXiv:2411.19701 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 29 Nov 2024]

Title:Precision benchmarks for solids: G0W0 calculations with different basis sets

Authors:Maryam Azizi, Francisco A. Delesma, Matteo Giantomassi, Davis Zavickis, Mikael Kuisma, Kristian Thyghesen, Dorothea Golze, Alexander Buccheri, Min-Ye Zhang, Patrick Rinke, Claudia Draxl, Andris Gulans, Xavier Gonze
View a PDF of the paper titled Precision benchmarks for solids: G0W0 calculations with different basis sets, by Maryam Azizi and 12 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The GW approximation within many-body perturbation theory is the state of the art for computing quasiparticle energies in solids. Typically, Kohn-Sham (KS) eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, obtained from a Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation are used as a starting point to build the Green's function G and the screened Coulomb interaction W, yielding the one-shot G0W0 selfenergy if no further update of these quantities are made. Multiple implementations exist for both the DFT and the subsequent G0W0 calculation, leading to possible differences in quasiparticle energies. In the present work, the G0W0 quasiparticle energies for states close to the band gap are calculated for six crystalline solids, using four different codes: Abinit, exciting, FHI-aims, and GPAW. This comparison helps to assess the impact of basis-set types (planewaves versus localized orbitals) and the treatment of core and valence electrons (all-electron full potentials versus pseudopotentials). The impact of unoccupied states as well as the algorithms for solving the quasiparticle equation are also briefly discussed. For the KS-DFT band gaps, we observe good agreement between all codes, with differences not exceeding 0.1 eV, while the G0W0 results deviate on the order of 0.1-0.3 eV. Between all-electron codes (FHI-aims and exciting), the agreement is better than 15 meV for KS-DFT and, with one exception, about 0.1 eV for G0W0 band gaps.
Comments: 14 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
ACM classes: G.1.4
Cite as: arXiv:2411.19701 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
  (or arXiv:2411.19701v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.19701
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Maryam Azizi [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:44:14 UTC (285 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Precision benchmarks for solids: G0W0 calculations with different basis sets, by Maryam Azizi and 12 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Ancillary-file links:

Ancillary files (details):

  • Supplemental_Material.pdf
Current browse context:
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
cond-mat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack