Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:physics/9902026

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Chemical Physics

arXiv:physics/9902026 (physics)
[Submitted on 10 Feb 1999 (v1), last revised 19 May 1999 (this version, v2)]

Title:Electron affinities of the first- and second- row atoms: benchmark ab initio and density functional calculations

Authors:Glenisson de Oliveira, Jan M.L. Martin, Frank de Proft, Paul Geerlings
View a PDF of the paper titled Electron affinities of the first- and second- row atoms: benchmark ab initio and density functional calculations, by Glenisson de Oliveira and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: A benchmark ab initio and density functional (DFT) study has been carried out on the electron affinities of the first- and second-row atoms. The ab initio study involves basis sets of $spdfgh$ and $spdfghi$ quality, extrapolations to the 1-particle basis set limit, and a combination of the CCSD(T), CCSDT, and full CI electron correlation methods. Scalar relativistic and spin-orbit coupling effects were taken into account. On average, the best ab initio results agree to better than 0.001 eV with the most recent experimental results. Correcting for imperfections in the CCSD(T) method improves the mean absolute error by an order of magnitude, while for accurate results on the second-row atoms inclusion of relativistic corrections is essential. The latter are significantly overestimated at the SCF level; for accurate spin-orbit splitting constants of second-row atoms inclusion of (2s,2p) correlation is essential. In the DFT calculations it is found that results for the 1st-row atoms are very sensitive to the exchange functional, while those for second-row atoms are rather more sensitive to the correlation functional. While the LYP correlation functional works best for first-row atoms, its PW91 counterpart appears to be preferable for second-row atoms. Among ``pure DFT'' (nonhybrid) functionals, G96PW91 (Gill 1996 exchange combined with Perdew-Wang 1991 correlation) puts in the best overall performance. The best results overall are obtained with the 1-parameter hybrid modified Perdew-Wang (mPW1) exchange functionals of Adamo and Barone [J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 108}, 664 (1998)], with mPW1LYP yielding the best results for first-row, and mPW1PW91 for second-row atoms. Indications exist that a hybrid of the type $a$ mPW1LYP + $(1-a)$ mPW1PW91 yields better results than either of the constituent functionals.
Comments: Phys. Rev. A, in press (revised version, review of issues concerning DFT and electron affinities added)
Subjects: Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph); Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:physics/9902026 [physics.chem-ph]
  (or arXiv:physics/9902026v2 [physics.chem-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/9902026
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Physical Review A 60, 1034-1045 (1999)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1034
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jan M. L. Martin [view email]
[v1] Wed, 10 Feb 1999 10:29:53 UTC (23 KB)
[v2] Wed, 19 May 1999 18:21:06 UTC (24 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Electron affinities of the first- and second- row atoms: benchmark ab initio and density functional calculations, by Glenisson de Oliveira and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.chem-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 1999-02

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack