close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cmp-lg > arXiv:cmp-lg/9410034

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computation and Language

arXiv:cmp-lg/9410034 (cmp-lg)
[Submitted on 31 Oct 1994]

Title:A Comparison of Two Smoothing Methods for Word Bigram Models

Authors:Linda Bauman Peto (University of Toronto)
View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparison of Two Smoothing Methods for Word Bigram Models, by Linda Bauman Peto (University of Toronto)
View PDF
Abstract: A COMPARISON OF TWO SMOOTHING METHODS FOR WORD BIGRAM MODELS
Linda Bauman Peto
Department of Computer Science
University of Toronto Abstract Word bigram models estimated from text corpora require smoothing methods to estimate the probabilities of unseen bigrams. The deleted estimation method uses the formula:
Pr(i|j) = lambda f_i + (1-lambda)f_i|j, where f_i and f_i|j are the relative frequency of i and the conditional relative frequency of i given j, respectively, and lambda is an optimized parameter. MacKay (1994) proposes a Bayesian approach using Dirichlet priors, which yields a different formula:
Pr(i|j) = (alpha/F_j + alpha) m_i + (1 - alpha/F_j + alpha) f_i|j where F_j is the count of j and alpha and m_i are optimized parameters. This thesis describes an experiment in which the two methods were trained on a two-million-word corpus taken from the Canadian _Hansard_ and compared on the basis of the experimental perplexity that they assigned to a shared test corpus. The methods proved to be about equally accurate, with MacKay's method using fewer resources.
Comments: this http URL. thesis, 57 pages, compressed and uucencoded postscript file
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Report number: CSRI-304
Cite as: arXiv:cmp-lg/9410034
  (or arXiv:cmp-lg/9410034v1 for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cmp-lg/9410034
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Linda Bauman Peto [view email]
[v1] Mon, 31 Oct 1994 19:55:57 UTC (100 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparison of Two Smoothing Methods for Word Bigram Models, by Linda Bauman Peto (University of Toronto)
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 1994-10

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Linda C. Bauman Peto
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack