close this message
arXiv smileybones

Happy Open Access Week from arXiv!

YOU make open access possible! Tell us why you support #openaccess and give to arXiv this week to help keep science open for all.

Donate!
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:astro-ph/9905186

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics

arXiv:astro-ph/9905186 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 14 May 1999 (v1), last revised 29 Aug 1999 (this version, v2)]

Title:Estimating beta from redshift-space distortions in the 2dF galaxy survey

Authors:S. J. Hatton, S. Cole
View a PDF of the paper titled Estimating beta from redshift-space distortions in the 2dF galaxy survey, by S. J. Hatton and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: Given the failure of existing models for redshift-space distortions to provide a highly accurate measure of the beta-parameter, and the ability of forthcoming surveys to obtain data with very low random errors, it becomes necessary to develop better models for these distortions. Here we review the failures of the commonly-used velocity dispersion models and present an empirical method for extracting beta from the quadrupole statistic that has little systematic offset over a wide range of beta and cosmologies. This empirical model is then applied to an ensemble of mock 2dF southern strip surveys, to illustrate the technique and see how accurately we can recover the true value of beta. We compare this treatment with the error we expect to find due only to the finite volume of the survey. We find that non-linear effects reduce the range of scales over which beta can be fitted, and introduce covariances between nearby modes in addition to those introduced by the convolution with the survey window function. The result is that we are only able to constrain beta to a 1-sigma accuracy of 25% (beta=0.55 +/- 0.14 for the cosmological model considered). We explore one possible means of reducing this error, that of cluster collapse, and show that accurate application of this method can greatly reduce the effect of non-linearities, improving the determination of beta. We conclude by demonstrating that, when the contaminating effects of clusters are dealt with, this simple analysis of the full 2dF survey yields beta=0.55 +/- 0.04. For this model this represents a determination of beta to an accuracy of 8% and hence an important constraint on the cosmological density parameter Omega_0.
Comments: 10 pages, slight changes made to agree with published version, now accepted by MNRAS
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:astro-ph/9905186
  (or arXiv:astro-ph/9905186v2 for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905186
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03034.x
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Steve Hatton [view email]
[v1] Fri, 14 May 1999 17:18:59 UTC (110 KB)
[v2] Sun, 29 Aug 1999 17:09:39 UTC (116 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Estimating beta from redshift-space distortions in the 2dF galaxy survey, by S. J. Hatton and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 1999-05

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status