Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:astro-ph/9905037

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics

arXiv:astro-ph/9905037 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 5 May 1999]

Title:The Origin of Present Day Cosmic Rays: Fresh SN Ejecta or Interstellar Medium Material ? I Cosmic Ray Composition and SN Nucleosynthesis. A Conflict with the Early Galactic Evolution of Be ?

Authors:J.P. Meyer (Saclay), D.C. Ellison (North Carolina)
View a PDF of the paper titled The Origin of Present Day Cosmic Rays: Fresh SN Ejecta or Interstellar Medium Material ? I Cosmic Ray Composition and SN Nucleosynthesis. A Conflict with the Early Galactic Evolution of Be ?, by J.P. Meyer (Saclay) and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: The composition of present day cosmic rays (CRs) is inconsistent with a significant acceleration of SN ejecta material (even with a preferential acceleration of ejecta grain material). Current CRs must result mainly from the acceleration of ISM ("solar mix") and circumstellar (22Ne- and 12C-rich WR wind) gas and grain material. The CR source composition, indeed, shows no anomaly related to SN nucleosynthesis: (i) The CR source FeNi/MgSiCa ratios have precisely solar mix values, while FeNi are mainly synthesized in SN Ia's, and MgSiCa in SN II's. If CR's originate in SN ejecta, this requires tight conditions on the acceleration efficiencies of the various SN Ia's and SN II's. (ii) The non-deficiency of the main-s-process elements, not made in any SN, relative to all elements made in SNae. (iii) All CR source isotope ratios are consistent with solar mix (except for the 22Ne and 12C excesses, WR wind). (iv) The absence of 59Ni in CRs implies that the time delay between the SN nucleosynthesis and their acceleration is > 10^5 yr. (v) The physics of SNR's and of CR shock acceleration implies that the acceleration of interior ejecta material is comparatively insignificant (Ellison & Meyer, this volume). Predominant acceleration of current CRs out of superbubble material also seems implausible. These conclusions regarding current CRs do not necessarily conflict with the linear evolution of Be/H in the early Galaxy. With the near absence of heavy elements in the early Galactic ISM, indeed, the acceleration of even a minute amount of freshly processed material must have then played a dominant role for the generation of Be from C and O. The "Be indicator" is blind to a possibly dominant early Galactic CR component originating in the ISM then composed of virtually pure H and He.
Comments: 21 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:astro-ph/9905037
  (or arXiv:astro-ph/9905037v1 for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9905037
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: [view email]
[v1] Wed, 5 May 1999 12:55:49 UTC (198 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Origin of Present Day Cosmic Rays: Fresh SN Ejecta or Interstellar Medium Material ? I Cosmic Ray Composition and SN Nucleosynthesis. A Conflict with the Early Galactic Evolution of Be ?, by J.P. Meyer (Saclay) and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 1999-05

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack