Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:astro-ph/0609178

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics

arXiv:astro-ph/0609178 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 7 Sep 2006]

Title:The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO Survey: The Star Formation Histories of Luminous Red Galaxies

Authors:Isaac G. Roseboom (UQ), Kevin A. Pimbblet (UQ), Michael J. Drinkwater (UQ), Russell D. Cannon (AAO), Roberto De Propris (CTIO), Alastair C. Edge (ICC, Durham), Daniel J. Eisenstein (Steward), Robert C. Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth), Ian Smail (ICC, Durham), David A. Wake (Durham), Joss Bland Hawthorn, Terry J. Bridges, Daniel Carson, Matthew Colless, Warrick J. Couch, Scott M. Croom, Simon P. Driver, Paul C. Hewett, Jon Loveday, Nic Ross, Donald P. Schneider, Tom Shanks, Robert G. Sharp, Peter Weilbacher
View a PDF of the paper titled The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO Survey: The Star Formation Histories of Luminous Red Galaxies, by Isaac G. Roseboom (UQ) and 26 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: We present a detailed investigation into the recent star formation histories of 5,697 Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) based on the Hdelta (4101A) and [OII] (3727A) lines. LRGs are luminous (L>3L*), galaxies which have been selected to have photometric properties consistent with an old, passively evolving stellar population. For this study we utilise LRGs from the recently completed 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey (2SLAQ). Equivalent widths of the Hdelta and [OII] lines are measured and used to define three spectral types, those with only strong Hdelta absorption (k+a), those with strong [OII] in emission (em) and those with both (em+a). All other LRGs are considered to have passive star formation histories. The vast majority of LRGs are found to be passive (~80 per cent), however significant numbers of k+a (2.7 per cent), em+a (1.2 per cent) and em LRGs (8.6 per cent) are identified. An investigation into the redshift dependence of the fractions is also performed. A sample of SDSS MAIN galaxies with colours and luminosities consistent with the 2SLAQ LRGs is selected to provide a low redshift comparison. While the em and em+a fractions are consistent with the low redshift SDSS sample, the fraction of k+a LRGs is found to increase significantly with redshift. This result is interpreted as an indication of an increasing amount of recent star formation activity in LRGs with redshift. By considering the expected life time of the k+a phase, the number of LRGs which will undergo a k+a phase can be estimated. A crude comparison of this estimate with the predictions from semi-analytic models of galaxy formation shows that the predicted level of k+a and em+a activity is not sufficient to reconcile the predicted mass growth for massive early-types in a hierarchical merging scenario.
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS, 13 pages, 10 figures
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:astro-ph/0609178
  (or arXiv:astro-ph/0609178v1 for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0609178
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.373:349-360,2006
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11024.x
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Isaac Roseboom [view email]
[v1] Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:42:34 UTC (162 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO Survey: The Star Formation Histories of Luminous Red Galaxies, by Isaac G. Roseboom (UQ) and 26 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2006-09

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack