Astrophysics
[Submitted on 8 May 2001]
Title:The Large Bright Quasar Survey VII. The LBQS and FIRST Surveys
View PDFAbstract: The source catalogue for the LBQS and the FIRST Survey are compared in their regions of overlap. In the 270 deg^2 common to both surveys the LBQS contains \~100,000 stellar and ~40,000 non-stellar objects, while the FIRST catalogue contains ~25,000 sources. Cross-correlation of these lists yields 67 positional coincidences between known LBQS quasars and FIRST sources and an additional 19 stellar and 149 non-stellar positional coincidences with the radio catalogue. Spectroscopy of all the stellar matches and two-thirds of the non-stellar matches produces eight new quasars. One BL Lac object, previously misclassified during the LBQS survey is also identified. The straightforward fractional incompleteness of the LBQS determined from this sample is 13+/-4%, in good agreement with the published estimate of 10%. The distributions of the ratio of radio-to-optical power, apparent magnitude and spectroscopic properties for the new objects are consistent with those of the 67 LBQS-FIRST objects previously known. The consistency of the optical and radio properties of the new objects with those of the known quasars thus supports the conclusion that no new population of objects, constituting more than ~7% of quasars detected by FIRST, has eluded the LBQS optical selection techniques. The percentage of radio-detected quasars in the LBQS catalogue is found to be 12+/-2%, considerably smaller than the value of 25% advocated by White et al. (2000) based on the FBQS. Apparent differences in the form of the number-redshift relation for the LBQS and FBQS samples are shown to arise in large part from the very different optical passbands employed.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.