Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:astro-ph/0105124

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics

arXiv:astro-ph/0105124 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 8 May 2001]

Title:The Large Bright Quasar Survey VII. The LBQS and FIRST Surveys

Authors:Paul C. Hewett, Craig B. Foltz, Frederic H. Chaffee
View a PDF of the paper titled The Large Bright Quasar Survey VII. The LBQS and FIRST Surveys, by Paul C. Hewett and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: The source catalogue for the LBQS and the FIRST Survey are compared in their regions of overlap. In the 270 deg^2 common to both surveys the LBQS contains \~100,000 stellar and ~40,000 non-stellar objects, while the FIRST catalogue contains ~25,000 sources. Cross-correlation of these lists yields 67 positional coincidences between known LBQS quasars and FIRST sources and an additional 19 stellar and 149 non-stellar positional coincidences with the radio catalogue. Spectroscopy of all the stellar matches and two-thirds of the non-stellar matches produces eight new quasars. One BL Lac object, previously misclassified during the LBQS survey is also identified. The straightforward fractional incompleteness of the LBQS determined from this sample is 13+/-4%, in good agreement with the published estimate of 10%. The distributions of the ratio of radio-to-optical power, apparent magnitude and spectroscopic properties for the new objects are consistent with those of the 67 LBQS-FIRST objects previously known. The consistency of the optical and radio properties of the new objects with those of the known quasars thus supports the conclusion that no new population of objects, constituting more than ~7% of quasars detected by FIRST, has eluded the LBQS optical selection techniques. The percentage of radio-detected quasars in the LBQS catalogue is found to be 12+/-2%, considerably smaller than the value of 25% advocated by White et al. (2000) based on the FBQS. Apparent differences in the form of the number-redshift relation for the LBQS and FBQS samples are shown to arise in large part from the very different optical passbands employed.
Comments: 30 pages, 6 figures To appear in Astronomy Journal, August 2001
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:astro-ph/0105124
  (or arXiv:astro-ph/0105124v1 for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0105124
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Astron.J.122:518-535,2001
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/321169
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Paul C. Hewett [view email]
[v1] Tue, 8 May 2001 10:13:30 UTC (72 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Large Bright Quasar Survey VII. The LBQS and FIRST Surveys, by Paul C. Hewett and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2001-05

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack