close this message
arXiv smileybones

Happy Open Access Week from arXiv!

YOU make open access possible! Tell us why you support #openaccess and give to arXiv this week to help keep science open for all.

Donate!
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2510.09662

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2510.09662 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Oct 2025]

Title:Assessment of different loss functions for fitting equivalent circuit models to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data

Authors:Ali Jaberi (3), Amin Sadeghi (2), Runze Zhang (1), Zhaoyang Zhao (1), Qiuyu Shi (1), Robert Black (3), Zoya Sadighi (3), Jason Hattrick-Simpers (1) ((1) Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, (2) Canmet MATERIALS, Natural Resources Canada, Hamilton, ON, Canada, (3) Clean Energy Innovation Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada)
View a PDF of the paper titled Assessment of different loss functions for fitting equivalent circuit models to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data, by Ali Jaberi (3) and 21 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data is typically modeled using an equivalent circuit model (ECM), with parameters obtained by minimizing a loss function via nonlinear least squares fitting. This paper introduces two new loss functions, log-B and log-BW, derived from the Bode representation of EIS. Using a large dataset of generated EIS data, the performance of proposed loss functions was evaluated alongside existing ones in terms of R2 scores, chi-squared, computational efficiency, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the predicted component values and the original values. Statistical comparisons revealed that the choice of loss function impacts convergence, computational efficiency, quality of fit, and MAPE. Our analysis showed that X2 loss function (squared sum of residuals with proportional weighting) achieved the highest performance across multiple quality of fit metrics, making it the preferred choice when the quality of fit is the primary goal. On the other hand, log-B offered a slightly lower quality of fit while being approximately 1.4 times faster and producing lower MAPE for most circuit components, making log-B as a strong alternative. This is a critical factor for large-scale least squares fitting in data-driven applications, such as training machine learning models on extensive datasets or iterations.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.09662 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2510.09662v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.09662
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ali Jaberi Dr [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:49:06 UTC (2,471 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Assessment of different loss functions for fitting equivalent circuit models to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data, by Ali Jaberi (3) and 21 other authors
  • View PDF
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-10
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status