close this message
arXiv smileybones

Happy Open Access Week from arXiv!

YOU make open access possible! Tell us why you support #openaccess and give to arXiv this week to help keep science open for all.

Donate!
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2510.05320

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2510.05320 (physics)
[Submitted on 6 Oct 2025]

Title:A Novel Helical Thin-Film Flow Diverter: Design, Fabrication, and Computational Assessment of Hemodynamic Performance

Authors:Samuel Voss, Philipp Berg, Janneck Stahl, Daniel Behme, Gabor Janiga, Rodrigo Lima de Miranda, Eckhard Quandt, Prasanth Velvaluri
View a PDF of the paper titled A Novel Helical Thin-Film Flow Diverter: Design, Fabrication, and Computational Assessment of Hemodynamic Performance, by Samuel Voss and 7 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Flow diversion has become a key treatment modality for selected intracranial aneurysms, relying on the principle that a dense mesh of stent wires disrupts blood flow into the aneurysm sac, promoting thrombosis and vessel reconstruction. Despite its clinical success, a subset of patients experiences incomplete occlusion or complications. This study investigates innovative helical thin-film implants (HTFIs), aiming to evaluate their flow-diverting efficacy. Highly resolved computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed on two representative patient-specific aneurysm models. Two HTFI design variants were tested at various configurations (two rolling angles and three deployment positions). A total of 28 unsteady hemodynamic simulations were performed, comparing six hemodynamically relevant parameters against the pre-interventional state and a conventional braided flow diverter. The HTFIs induced significant changes in intra-aneurysmal flow. Both designs performed similarly overall, with the shorter configurations (smaller rolling angle) demonstrating superior efficacy. These achieved average hemodynamic reductions of 52.2% and 58.4%, outperforming the benchmark braided flow diverter device (47.4%). Sensitivity to positioning was modest, with the best configuration showing an average variation of only 5.3%, suggesting good robustness despite the helical design's heterogeneous porosity. These findings indicate that HTFIs offer promising flow-diverting capabilities. With further refinement in design and hemodynamic optimization, these implants hold potential as a next-generation alternative for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, especially in applications requiring compatibility with smaller delivery systems.
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.05320 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2510.05320v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.05320
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Prasanth Velvlauri [view email]
[v1] Mon, 6 Oct 2025 19:34:59 UTC (924 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Novel Helical Thin-Film Flow Diverter: Design, Fabrication, and Computational Assessment of Hemodynamic Performance, by Samuel Voss and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-10
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status