Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2509.10505

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

arXiv:2509.10505 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 1 Sep 2025 (v1), last revised 8 Oct 2025 (this version, v5)]

Title:Template-Free Gravitational Wave Detection with CWT-LSTM Autoencoders: A Case Study of Run-Dependent Calibration Effects in LIGO Data

Authors:Jericho Cain
View a PDF of the paper titled Template-Free Gravitational Wave Detection with CWT-LSTM Autoencoders: A Case Study of Run-Dependent Calibration Effects in LIGO Data, by Jericho Cain
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Gravitational wave detection requires sophisticated signal processing to identify weak astrophysical signals buried in instrumental noise. Traditional matched filtering approaches face computational challenges with diverse signal morphologies and non-stationary noise. This work presents an unsupervised deep learning methodology integrating Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) preprocessing with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) autoencoder architecture for template-free gravitational wave detection. We train and evaluate our model on LIGO H1 data from Observing Run 4 (O4, 2023-2024), comprising 126 confirmed gravitational wave events from the GWTC-4.0 catalog and 1991 noise segments. During development, we discovered that reconstruction errors from multi-run training (O1-O4) clustered by observing run rather than astrophysical parameters, revealing systematic batch effects from GWOSC's evolving calibration procedures. Following LIGO's established practice of per-run optimization, we adopted single-run (O4) training, which eliminated these batch effects and improved recall from 52% to 96% while maintaining 97% precision. The final model achieves 97.0% precision, 96.1% recall, F1-score 96.6%, and ROC-AUC 0.994 on 102 test signals and 399 noise segments. The reconstruction error distribution shows clean separation between noise (mean 0.48) and signals (mean 0.77). This unsupervised, template-free approach demonstrates that anomaly detection can achieve performance competitive with supervised methods while enabling discovery of signals with unexpected morphologies. Our identification and resolution of cross-run batch effects provides methodological guidance for future machine learning applications to multi-epoch gravitational wave datasets.
Comments: While extending this to L1 data we discovered a critical bug in our evaluation that led us down an investigative path of run-dependent calibration effects. The results changed to something more natural and this calibration effects have been documented
Subjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:2509.10505 [astro-ph.IM]
  (or arXiv:2509.10505v5 [astro-ph.IM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.10505
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jericho Cain PhD [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Sep 2025 21:45:32 UTC (517 KB)
[v2] Fri, 26 Sep 2025 03:17:19 UTC (5,462 KB)
[v3] Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:03:25 UTC (5,462 KB)
[v4] Sun, 5 Oct 2025 17:11:02 UTC (5,432 KB)
[v5] Wed, 8 Oct 2025 19:32:03 UTC (8,090 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Template-Free Gravitational Wave Detection with CWT-LSTM Autoencoders: A Case Study of Run-Dependent Calibration Effects in LIGO Data, by Jericho Cain
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.IM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
gr-qc

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack