Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2509.00148

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:2509.00148 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 29 Aug 2025]

Title:SQuIGG$\vec{L}$E: Buried star formation cannot explain the rapidly fading CO(2-1) luminosity in massive, $z\sim0.7$ post-starburst galaxies

Authors:David J. Setton, Justin S. Spilker, Rachel Bezanson, Katherine A. Suess, Jenny E. Greene, Andy D. Goulding, Elia Cenci, Vincenzo R. D'Onofrio, Robert Feldmann, Mariska Kriek, Anika Kumar, Yuanze Luo, Desika Narayanan, Margaret E. Verrico, Pengpei Zhu
View a PDF of the paper titled SQuIGG$\vec{L}$E: Buried star formation cannot explain the rapidly fading CO(2-1) luminosity in massive, $z\sim0.7$ post-starburst galaxies, by David J. Setton and 14 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Observational and theoretical studies have long held that rapid gas consumption in starbursts is responsible for the formation of quiescent galaxies. However, studies of recently quenched ``post-starburst" galaxies have discovered that a number of them are surprisingly luminous in CO, challenging this assumption. We present deep ALMA CO(2-1) observations of 50 massive ($\log(M_\star/M_\odot)\sim11.2$) post-starburst galaxies from the SQuIGG$\vec{L}$E sample at $z\sim0.7$. We detect a large fraction (27/50) of the galaxies in CO(2-1). Furthermore, we find that the CO luminosity correlates with the age of the recent starburst, suggesting a gas-removal timescale of $\lesssim140$ Myr, an order of magnitude shorter than is implied by their rest optical star formation rates. We perform new spectral energy distribution fits incorporating mid- and far-IR photometry to test whether dust-obscured star formation can explain this trend. We find that while allowing for buried star formation can raise star formation rates by $\sim0.5$ dex, for almost all galaxies it is neither required to fit the observed IR SED, nor is it sufficient to explain the observed depletion trend. Even the combination of significant buried star formation and ULIRG-like $\alpha_{CO}$ is not enough to explain this decay in CO luminosity. Furthermore, there is no strong evidence to support either of those modifications to the depletion time. Therefore, it remains a distinct possibility that the age-CO luminosity trend should not be interpreted as an evolutionary sequence, and that gas-rich SQuIGG$\vec{L}$E galaxies will soon rejuvenate.
Comments: Submitted to ApJ; 23 pages, 12 figures (+ appendix). See also companion research note, Kumar et al., which studies the serendipitously detected CO "buddy" galaxies found near these post-starburst galaxies. Comments welcome!
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:2509.00148 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2509.00148v1 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.00148
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: David Setton [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 Aug 2025 18:00:00 UTC (4,228 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled SQuIGG$\vec{L}$E: Buried star formation cannot explain the rapidly fading CO(2-1) luminosity in massive, $z\sim0.7$ post-starburst galaxies, by David J. Setton and 14 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack