Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2508.01127

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:2508.01127 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 2 Aug 2025 (v1), last revised 25 Aug 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Revisiting the Proper Motions of M31 and M33 Using Massive Supergiant Stars with Gaia DR3

Authors:Hao Wu, Yang Huang, Huawei Zhang, Qikang Feng
View a PDF of the paper titled Revisiting the Proper Motions of M31 and M33 Using Massive Supergiant Stars with Gaia DR3, by Hao Wu and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The proper motions (PMs) of M31 and M33 are key to understanding the Local Group's dynamical evolution. However, measurement discrepancies between Gaia blue and red samples, regarding whether the transverse velocity is remarkable, introduce significant ambiguity. In this work, we remeasure the systemic PMs of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars from Gaia Data Release 3. Clean disk tracers are selected via color-color diagrams, with foreground contaminants removed through kinematic and astrometric cuts. We identify the discrepancy in M31's blue and red samples as arising from systematic differences between Gaia's 5-parameter (5p) and 6-parameter (6p) astrometric solutions. The 6p solution, applied to sources lacking accurate color information, relies on a pseudo-color approximation, leading to lower precision and larger uncertainties. Two key limitations of the 6p solution are: 1) degraded astrometric accuracy for very red sources (GBP - GRP > 2.6); 2) significant PM zero-point offsets. In our sample, red sources are dominated by the 6p solution, while blue sources include a substantial fraction of 5p sources; this mismatch drives the observed discrepancy. By excluding extreme red sources and calibrating PM zero-points separately for 5p and 6p sources using background quasars, we reduce the discrepancy, bringing blue and red measurements into agreement within 1 sigma. We ultimately report the most robust Gaia-based PMs using high-quality 5p sources. For M31, we obtain ({\mu}_{\alpha}*, {\mu}_{\delta})_M31 = (45.9 +/- 8.1, -20.5 +/- 6.6) {\mu}as/yr, consistent with, but more precise than, the HST result. For M33, we find ({\mu}_{\alpha}*, {\mu}_{\delta})_M33 = (45.3 +/- 9.7, 26.3 +/- 7.3) {\mu}as/yr, agreeing with VLBA measurement within 1.5 sigma. These results support a first infall scenario for M33.
Comments: 15 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables, Accepted for publication in A&A
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:2508.01127 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2508.01127v2 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.01127
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 701, A265 (2025)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555477
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Hao Wu [view email]
[v1] Sat, 2 Aug 2025 00:49:15 UTC (3,273 KB)
[v2] Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:22:30 UTC (666 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Revisiting the Proper Motions of M31 and M33 Using Massive Supergiant Stars with Gaia DR3, by Hao Wu and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack