Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2508.00073

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2508.00073 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 31 Jul 2025]

Title:The Simons Observatory: Assessing the Impact of Dust Complexity on the Recovery of Primordial $B$-modes

Authors:Yiqi Liu, Susanna Azzoni, Susan E. Clark, Brandon S. Hensley, Léo Vacher, David Alonso, Carlo Baccigalupi, Michael L. Brown, Alessandro Carones, Jens Chluba, Jo Dunkley, Carlos Hervías-Caimapo, Bradley R. Johnson, Nicoletta Krachmalnicoff, Giuseppe Puglisi, Mathieu Remazeilles, Kevin Wolz
View a PDF of the paper titled The Simons Observatory: Assessing the Impact of Dust Complexity on the Recovery of Primordial $B$-modes, by Yiqi Liu and 16 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We investigate how dust foreground complexity can affect measurements of the tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r$, in the context of the Simons Observatory, using a cross-spectrum component separation analysis. Employing a suite of simulations with realistic Galactic dust emission, we find that spatial variation in the dust frequency spectrum, parametrized by $\beta_d$, can bias the estimate for $r$ when modeled using a low-order moment expansion to capture this spatial variation. While this approach performs well across a broad range of dust complexity, the bias increases with more extreme spatial variation in dust frequency spectrum, reaching as high as $r\sim0.03$ for simulations with no primordial tensors and a spatial dispersion of $\sigma(\beta_d)\simeq0.3$ -- the most extreme case considered, yet still consistent with current observational constraints. This bias is driven by changes in the $\ell$-dependence of the dust power spectrum as a function of frequency that can mimic a primordial $B$-mode tensor signal. Although low-order moment expansions fail to capture the full effect when the spatial variations of $\beta_d$ become large and highly non-Gaussian, our results show that extended parametric methods can still recover unbiased estimates of $r$ under a wide range of dust complexities. We further find that the bias in $r$, at the highest degrees of dust complexity, is largely insensitive to the spatial structure of the dust amplitude and is instead dominated by spatial correlations between $\beta_d$ and dust amplitude, particularly at higher orders. If $\beta_d$ does spatially vary at the highest levels investigated here, we would expect to use more flexible foreground models to achieve an unbiased constraint on $r$ for the noise levels anticipated from the Simons Observatory.
Comments: 27 pages, 14 figures, submitted to JCAP
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:2508.00073 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2508.00073v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.00073
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yiqi Liu [view email]
[v1] Thu, 31 Jul 2025 18:04:23 UTC (2,964 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Simons Observatory: Assessing the Impact of Dust Complexity on the Recovery of Primordial $B$-modes, by Yiqi Liu and 16 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack