Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-bio > arXiv:2506.01137

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods

arXiv:2506.01137 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 1 Jun 2025]

Title:Comparative analysis of computational approaches for predicting Transthyretin transcription activators and human dopamine D1 receptor antagonists

Authors:Mariya L. Ivanova, Nicola Russo, Konstantin Nikolic
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative analysis of computational approaches for predicting Transthyretin transcription activators and human dopamine D1 receptor antagonists, by Mariya L. Ivanova and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The study expands the application of scikit-learn-based machine learning (ML) to the prediction of small biomolecule functionalities based on Carbon 13 isotope (13C) NMR spectroscopy data derived from Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) notations. The methodology previously demonstrated by predicting dopamine D1 receptor antagonists was upgraded with addition of new molecular features derived from the PubChem database. The enhanced ML model obtained 75.8% Accuracy, 84.2% Precision, 63.6% Recall, 72.5% F1-score, 75.8 % ROC, when is trained by 25,532 samples and tested by 5,466 samples. To evaluate the applicability of the methodology for a variety of case studies, a comparison was conducted between the prediction capabilities of the ML models based on the human dopamine D1 receptor antagonists and on the neuronal Transthyretin (TTR) transcription activators. Since the TTR bioassay did not contain the needed for the comparison number of samples, the results were obtained hypothetically. Gradient Boosting classifier was the optimal model for TTR transcription activators achieving hypothetical 67.4% Accuracy, 74.0% Precision, 53.5% Recall, 62.1% F1-score, 67.4 % ROC, if it would be trained with 25,532 samples and tested with 5,466 samples. Beyond the main study, the CID_SID ML model that can predict if a small biomolecule has TTR transcription activation capabilities based solely on its PubChem CID and SID achieved 81.5% Accuracy, 94.6% Precision, 66.8% Recall, 78.3% F1-score, 81.5 % ROC.
Comments: 26 pages, 26 tables, 8 figures
Subjects: Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
Cite as: arXiv:2506.01137 [q-bio.QM]
  (or arXiv:2506.01137v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.01137
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Mariya Ivanova [view email]
[v1] Sun, 1 Jun 2025 19:45:49 UTC (1,834 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative analysis of computational approaches for predicting Transthyretin transcription activators and human dopamine D1 receptor antagonists, by Mariya L. Ivanova and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.QM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-06
Change to browse by:
q-bio

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack