Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2504.18042

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:2504.18042 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 25 Apr 2025 (v1), last revised 8 May 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Mock Observations: Morphological Analysis of Galaxies in TNG100 Simulations

Authors:Jun-Yu Gong, Weipeng Lin, Lin Tang, Yanyao Lan
View a PDF of the paper titled Mock Observations: Morphological Analysis of Galaxies in TNG100 Simulations, by Jun-Yu Gong and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In this study, we investigate the morphology of galaxies in the TNG100 simulation by applying mock observation techniques and compare the results with the observational data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). By employing a hierarchical Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approach, we classify galaxies into four morphological categories (Ellipticals, S0/a, Sab/Sb, and Sc/Sd/Irregulars). Our findings show that the morphological characteristics of the mock-observed galaxy samples closely match those observed in the SDSS, successfully reproducing key features such as distinct parameter distributions for different types. However, some discrepancies are identified: notably, a significant lack of early-type galaxies (ETGs) in the dwarf galaxy regime ($M_* < 10^{10} M_{\odot}$) and minimal distinction between Sab/Sb and Sc/Sd/Irregular galaxies in the mock-observed samples, unlike the clear differences seen in actual observations. These divergences may stem from simulation properties such as elevated star formation efficiency at low mass end or resolution limits. Observational effects, including the impact of the Point Spread Function, sky background, and instrumental noise, can independently cause approximately 7.87\% morphological misclassifications by our CNN model. Compared to previous studies using gravity-based definitions of galaxies that failed to clearly distinguish the parameter distributions of ETGs versus Late-Type Galaxies, our brightness-based sample definition method better recovers the observed morphological parameter distributions, especially their distinct differences. Our study underscores that, alongside mock observations, employing galaxy segmentation methods consistent with observational practices is crucial for appropriately recovering realistic morphological parameters from simulations and enabling fair comparisons.
Comments: 29 pages, 10 figures, 1 table, accept for the publication in ApJS
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:2504.18042 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2504.18042v2 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.18042
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Gong Jun-Yu [view email]
[v1] Fri, 25 Apr 2025 03:25:46 UTC (17,718 KB)
[v2] Thu, 8 May 2025 01:52:30 UTC (17,716 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Mock Observations: Morphological Analysis of Galaxies in TNG100 Simulations, by Jun-Yu Gong and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack