close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2504.14561

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:2504.14561 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Apr 2025]

Title:Proof Scores: A Survey (full version)

Authors:Adrian Riesco, Kazuhiro Ogata, Masaki Nakamura, Daniel Gaina, Duong Dinh Tran, Kokichi Futatsugi
View a PDF of the paper titled Proof Scores: A Survey (full version), by Adrian Riesco and Kazuhiro Ogata and Masaki Nakamura and Daniel Gaina and Duong Dinh Tran and Kokichi Futatsugi
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Proof scores can be regarded as outlines of the formal verification of system properties. They have been historically used by the OBJ family of specification languages. The main advantage of proof scores is that they follow the same syntax as the specification language they are used in, so specifiers can easily adopt them and use as many features as the particular language provides. In this way, proof scores have been successfully used to prove properties of a large number of systems and protocols. However, proof scores also present a number of disadvantages that prevented a large audience from adopting them as proving mechanism. In this paper we present the theoretical foundations of proof scores; the different systems where they have been adopted and their latest developments; the classes of systems successfully verified using proof scores, including the main techniques used for it; the main reasons why they have not been widely adopted; and finally we discuss some directions of future work that might solve the problems discussed previously.
Comments: Proof Scores: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (April 2025)
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
Cite as: arXiv:2504.14561 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:2504.14561v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.14561
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3729166
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Adrián Riesco [view email]
[v1] Sun, 20 Apr 2025 10:17:45 UTC (70 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Proof Scores: A Survey (full version), by Adrian Riesco and Kazuhiro Ogata and Masaki Nakamura and Daniel Gaina and Duong Dinh Tran and Kokichi Futatsugi
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack