Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2504.08640

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2504.08640 (cs)
[Submitted on 11 Apr 2025]

Title:Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents

Authors:Alessio Buscemi, Daniele Proverbio, Paolo Bova, Nataliya Balabanova, Adeela Bashir, Theodor Cimpeanu, Henrique Correia da Fonseca, Manh Hong Duong, Elias Fernandez Domingos, Antonio M. Fernandes, Marcus Krellner, Ndidi Bianca Ogbo, Simon T. Powers, Fernando P. Santos, Zia Ush Shamszaman, Zhao Song, Alessandro Di Stefano, The Anh Han
View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents, by Alessio Buscemi and 17 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:There is general agreement that fostering trust and cooperation within the AI development ecosystem is essential to promote the adoption of trustworthy AI systems. By embedding Large Language Model (LLM) agents within an evolutionary game-theoretic framework, this paper investigates the complex interplay between AI developers, regulators and users, modelling their strategic choices under different regulatory scenarios. Evolutionary game theory (EGT) is used to quantitatively model the dilemmas faced by each actor, and LLMs provide additional degrees of complexity and nuances and enable repeated games and incorporation of personality traits. Our research identifies emerging behaviours of strategic AI agents, which tend to adopt more "pessimistic" (not trusting and defective) stances than pure game-theoretic agents. We observe that, in case of full trust by users, incentives are effective to promote effective regulation; however, conditional trust may deteriorate the "social pact". Establishing a virtuous feedback between users' trust and regulators' reputation thus appears to be key to nudge developers towards creating safe AI. However, the level at which this trust emerges may depend on the specific LLM used for testing. Our results thus provide guidance for AI regulation systems, and help predict the outcome of strategic LLM agents, should they be used to aid regulation itself.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Chaotic Dynamics (nlin.CD)
Cite as: arXiv:2504.08640 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2504.08640v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08640
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: The Anh Han [view email]
[v1] Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:41:21 UTC (7,389 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents, by Alessio Buscemi and 17 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CY
cs.GT
nlin
nlin.CD

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack