Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2503.22228

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2503.22228 (cs)
This paper has been withdrawn by Jie Su
[Submitted on 28 Mar 2025 (v1), last revised 23 May 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:MFH: A Multi-faceted Heuristic Algorithm Selection Approach for Software Verification

Authors:Jie Su, Liansai Deng, Cheng Wen, Rong Wang, Zhi Ma, Nan Zhang, Cong Tian, Zhenhua Duan, Shengchao Qin
View a PDF of the paper titled MFH: A Multi-faceted Heuristic Algorithm Selection Approach for Software Verification, by Jie Su and 8 other authors
No PDF available, click to view other formats
Abstract:Currently, many verification algorithms are available to improve the reliability of software systems. Selecting the appropriate verification algorithm typically demands domain expertise and non-trivial manpower. An automated algorithm selector is thus desired. However, existing selectors, either depend on machine-learned strategies or manually designed heuristics, encounter issues such as reliance on high-quality samples with algorithm labels and limited scalability. In this paper, an automated algorithm selection approach, namely MFH, is proposed for software verification. Our approach leverages the heuristics that verifiers producing correct results typically implement certain appropriate algorithms, and the supported algorithms by these verifiers indirectly reflect which ones are potentially applicable. Specifically, MFH embeds the code property graph (CPG) of a semantic-preserving transformed program to enhance the robustness of the prediction model. Furthermore, our approach decomposes the selection task into the sub-tasks of predicting potentially applicable algorithms and matching the most appropriate verifiers. Additionally, MFH also introduces a feedback loop on incorrect predictions to improve model prediction accuracy. We evaluate MFH on 20 verifiers and over 15,000 verification tasks. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of MFH, achieving a prediction accuracy of 91.47% even without ground truth algorithm labels provided during the training phase. Moreover, the prediction accuracy decreases only by 0.84% when introducing 10 new verifiers, indicating the strong scalability of the proposed approach.
Comments: The decision to withdraw the paper is driven by two reasons: 1. A conflict of interest arises from the proposed methods overlapping with pending patent applications by other authors. 2. Upon thorough review, it has been discovered that the paper contains ambiguities and inaccuracies in describing the method, potentially hindering readers' comprehension of the content
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.11; D.2.4
Cite as: arXiv:2503.22228 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2503.22228v2 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.22228
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jie Su [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Mar 2025 08:21:00 UTC (496 KB)
[v2] Fri, 23 May 2025 15:03:51 UTC (1 KB) (withdrawn)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled MFH: A Multi-faceted Heuristic Algorithm Selection Approach for Software Verification, by Jie Su and 8 other authors
  • Withdrawn
No license for this version due to withdrawn
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack