Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2503.17661

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:2503.17661 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Mar 2025 (v1), last revised 30 Mar 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:A Qualitative Study of User Perception of M365 AI Copilot

Authors:Muneera Bano, Didar Zowghi, Jon Whittle, Liming Zhu, Andrew Reeson, Rob Martin, Jen Parsons
View a PDF of the paper titled A Qualitative Study of User Perception of M365 AI Copilot, by Muneera Bano and 6 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Adopting AI copilots in professional workflows presents opportunities for enhanced productivity, efficiency, and decision making. In this paper, we present results from a six month trial of M365 Copilot conducted at our organisation in 2024. A qualitative interview study was carried out with 27 participants. The study explored user perceptions of M365 Copilot's effectiveness, productivity impact, evolving expectations, ethical concerns, and overall satisfaction. Initial enthusiasm for the tool was met with mixed post trial experiences. While some users found M365 Copilot beneficial for tasks such as email coaching, meeting summaries, and content retrieval, others reported unmet expectations in areas requiring deeper contextual understanding, reasoning, and integration with existing workflows. Ethical concerns were a recurring theme, with users highlighting issues related to data privacy, transparency, and AI bias. While M365 Copilot demonstrated value in specific operational areas, its broader impact remained constrained by usability limitations and the need for human oversight to validate AI generated outputs.
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2503.17661 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:2503.17661v2 [cs.CY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.17661
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Muneera Bano Dr [view email]
[v1] Sat, 22 Mar 2025 06:11:10 UTC (429 KB)
[v2] Sun, 30 Mar 2025 01:08:08 UTC (428 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Qualitative Study of User Perception of M365 AI Copilot, by Muneera Bano and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.CY
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack