Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2503.16468

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2503.16468 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Feb 2025]

Title:Towards properly implementing Theory of Mind in AI systems: An account of four misconceptions

Authors:Ramira van der Meulen, Rineke Verbrugge, Max van Duijn
View a PDF of the paper titled Towards properly implementing Theory of Mind in AI systems: An account of four misconceptions, by Ramira van der Meulen and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The search for effective collaboration between humans and computer systems is one of the biggest challenges in Artificial Intelligence. One of the more effective mechanisms that humans use to coordinate with one another is theory of mind (ToM). ToM can be described as the ability to `take someone else's perspective and make estimations of their beliefs, desires and intentions, in order to make sense of their behaviour and attitudes towards the world'. If leveraged properly, this skill can be very useful in Human-AI collaboration.
This introduces the question how we implement ToM when building an AI system. Humans and AI Systems work quite differently, and ToM is a multifaceted concept, each facet rooted in different research traditions across the cognitive and developmental sciences. We observe that researchers from artificial intelligence and the computing sciences, ourselves included, often have difficulties finding their way in the ToM literature. In this paper, we identify four common misconceptions around ToM that we believe should be taken into account when developing an AI system. We have hyperbolised these misconceptions for the sake of the argument, but add nuance in their discussion.
The misconceptions we discuss are:
(1) "Humans Use a ToM Module, So AI Systems Should As Well".
(2) "Every Social Interaction Requires (Advanced) ToM".
(3) "All ToM is the Same".
(4) "Current Systems Already Have ToM".
After discussing the misconception, we end each section by providing tentative guidelines on how the misconception can be overcome.
Comments: 19 pages, draft version
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2503.16468 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2503.16468v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.16468
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ramira Van Der Meulen [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Feb 2025 19:12:35 UTC (71 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Towards properly implementing Theory of Mind in AI systems: An account of four misconceptions, by Ramira van der Meulen and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack