Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:2503.10302

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:2503.10302 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 13 Mar 2025 (v1), last revised 7 Apr 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Pushing the Boundary of Quantum Advantage in Hard Combinatorial Optimization with Probabilistic Computers

Authors:Shuvro Chowdhury, Navid Anjum Aadit, Andrea Grimaldi, Eleonora Raimondo, Atharva Raut, P. Aaron Lott, Johan H. Mentink, Marek M. Rams, Federico Ricci-Tersenghi, Massimo Chiappini, Luke S. Theogarajan, Tathagata Srimani, Giovanni Finocchio, Masoud Mohseni, Kerem Y. Camsari
View a PDF of the paper titled Pushing the Boundary of Quantum Advantage in Hard Combinatorial Optimization with Probabilistic Computers, by Shuvro Chowdhury and 14 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recent demonstrations on specialized benchmarks have reignited excitement for quantum computers, yet whether they can deliver an advantage for practical real-world problems remains an open question. Here, we show that probabilistic computers (p-computers) when co-designed with hardware to implement powerful Monte Carlo algorithms can surpass state-of-the-art quantum annealers <a href="this https URL target="_blank">[King et al., Nature (2023)]</a> in solving certain hard optimization problems. We focus on two key algorithms: discrete-time simulated quantum annealing (DT-SQA) and adaptive parallel tempering (APT), both applied to 3D spin glasses. For DT-SQA, we find that increasing the number of replicas improves residual energy scaling, while parallelizing fewer replicas across independent runs also achieves comparable scaling. Both strategies align with the theoretical expectations from extreme value theory. In addition, APT outperforms DT-SQA when supported by non-local isoenergetic cluster moves. Finite-size scaling analysis suggests a universal behavior that explains the superior performance of APT over both DT-SQA and quantum annealing. We show that these algorithms are readily implementable in modern hardware thanks to the mature semiconductor technology. Unlike software simulations, replicas can be monolithically housed on a single chip and a large number of spins can be updated in parallel and asynchronously, similar to a quantum annealer. We project that custom Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) or specialized chips leveraging massive parallelism can further accelerate these algorithms by orders of magnitude, while drastically improving energy efficiency. Our results raise the bar for a practical quantum advantage in optimization and present p-computers as scalable, energy-efficient hardware for real-world optimization problems.
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Disordered Systems and Neural Networks (cond-mat.dis-nn); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)
Cite as: arXiv:2503.10302 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2503.10302v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.10302
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Shuvro Chowdhury [view email]
[v1] Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:24:13 UTC (13,484 KB)
[v2] Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:06:25 UTC (13,528 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Pushing the Boundary of Quantum Advantage in Hard Combinatorial Optimization with Probabilistic Computers, by Shuvro Chowdhury and 14 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-03
Change to browse by:
cond-mat
cond-mat.dis-nn
cs
cs.ET

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack