Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2503.02485

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2503.02485 (physics)
[Submitted on 4 Mar 2025]

Title:Calibration of the mechanical boundary conditions for a patient-specific thoracic aorta model including the heart motion effect

Authors:Leonardo Geronzi, Aline Bel-Brunon, Antonio Martinez, Michel Rochette, Marco Sensale, Olivier Bouchot, Alain Lalande, Siyu Lin, Pier Paolo Valentini, Marco Evangelos Biancolini
View a PDF of the paper titled Calibration of the mechanical boundary conditions for a patient-specific thoracic aorta model including the heart motion effect, by Leonardo Geronzi and 9 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Objective: we propose a procedure for calibrating 4 parameters governing the mechanical boundary conditions (BCs) of a thoracic aorta (TA) model derived from one patient with ascending aortic aneurysm. The BCs reproduce the visco-elastic structural support provided by the soft tissue and the spine and allow for the inclusion of the heart motion effect.
Methods: we first segment the TA from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) angiography and derive the heart motion by tracking the aortic annulus from cine-MRI. A rigid-wall fluid-dynamic simulation is performed to derive the time-varying wall pressure field. We build the finite element model considering patient-specific material properties and imposing the derived pressure field and the motion at the annulus boundary. The calibration, which involves the zero-pressure state computation, is based on purely structural simulations. After obtaining the vessel boundaries from the cine-MRI sequences, an iterative procedure is performed to minimize the distance between them and the corresponding boundaries derived from the deformed structural model. A strongly-coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis is finally performed with the tuned parameters and compared to the purely structural simulation.
Results and Conclusion: the calibration with structural simulations allows to reduce maximum and mean distances between image-derived and simulation-derived boundaries from 8.64 mm to 6.37 mm and from 2.24 mm to 1.83 mm, respectively. The maximum root mean square error between the deformed structural and FSI surface meshes is 0.19 mm. This procedure may prove crucial for increasing the model fidelity in replicating the real aortic root kinematics.
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)
Cite as: arXiv:2503.02485 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2503.02485v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.02485
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Volume: 70 Issue: 11, November 2023, IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2023.3287680
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Leonardo Geronzi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:50:10 UTC (5,090 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Calibration of the mechanical boundary conditions for a patient-specific thoracic aorta model including the heart motion effect, by Leonardo Geronzi and 9 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.NA
math
math.NA
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack