Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2502.20095

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Systems and Control

arXiv:2502.20095 (eess)
[Submitted on 27 Feb 2025 (v1), last revised 2 Jun 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Comparative Performance Analysis of Numerical Discretization Methods for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-ion Batteries

Authors:Feng Guo, Luis D. Couto
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative Performance Analysis of Numerical Discretization Methods for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-ion Batteries, by Feng Guo and Luis D. Couto
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:This study evaluates numerical discretization methods for the Single Particle Model (SPM) used in electrochemical modeling. The methods include the Finite Difference Method (FDM), spectral methods, Padé approximation, and parabolic approximation. Evaluation criteria are accuracy, execution time, and memory usage, aiming to guide method selection for electrochemical models. Under constant current conditions, the FDM explicit Euler and Runge-Kutta methods show significant errors, while the FDM implicit Euler method improves accuracy with more nodes. The spectral method achieves the best accuracy and convergence with as few as five nodes. The Padé approximation exhibits increasing errors with higher current, and the parabolic approximation shows higher errors than the converged spectral and FDM implicit Euler methods. Under dynamic conditions, frequency domain analysis indicates that the FDM, spectral, and Padé approximation methods improve high-frequency response by increasing node count or method order. In terms of execution time, the parabolic method is fastest, followed by the Padé approximation. The spectral method is faster than FDM, while the FDM implicit Euler method is the slowest. Memory usage is lowest for the parabolic and Padé methods, moderate for FDM, and highest for the spectral method. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting discretization methods under different operating scenarios.
Comments: 37 pages, 7 figures
Subjects: Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2502.20095 [eess.SY]
  (or arXiv:2502.20095v2 [eess.SY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.20095
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Journal of Power Sources, Volume 650, 2025, 237365
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.237365
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Feng Guo [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:53:16 UTC (162 KB)
[v2] Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:26:33 UTC (281 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative Performance Analysis of Numerical Discretization Methods for Electrochemical Models of Lithium-ion Batteries, by Feng Guo and Luis D. Couto
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
eess.SY
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack