Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2502.08219 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Feb 2025]

Title:Tracking Down Software Cluster Bombs: A Current State Analysis of the Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) Ecosystem

Authors:Stefan Tatschner (1 and 2), Michael P. Heinl (1 and 3 and 4), Nicole Pappler (2), Tobias Specht (1), Sven Plaga (5), Thomas Newe (2) ((1) Fraunhofer AISEC, Garching bei München, Bavaria, Germany, (2) University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland, (3) Technical University of Munich, Garching bei München, Bavaria, Germany, (4) Munich University of Applied Sciences HM, Munich, Bavaria, Germany, (5) Center for Intelligence and Security Studies (CISS), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany)
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Throughout computer history, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that critical software vulnerabilities can significantly affect the components involved. In the Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) ecosystem, most software is distributed through package repositories. Nowadays, monitoring critical dependencies in a software system is essential for maintaining robust security practices. This is particularly important due to new legal requirements, such as the European Cyber Resilience Act, which necessitate that software projects maintain a transparent track record with Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) and ensure a good overall state. This study provides a summary of the current state of available FLOSS package repositories and addresses the challenge of identifying problematic areas within a software ecosystem. These areas are analyzed in detail, quantifying the current state of the FLOSS ecosystem. The results indicate that while there are well-maintained projects within the FLOSS ecosystem, there are also high-impact projects that are susceptible to supply chain attacks. This study proposes a method for analyzing the current state and identifies missing elements, such as interfaces, for future research.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2502.08219 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2502.08219v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08219

Submission history

From: Stefan Tatschner [view email]
[v1] Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:57:57 UTC (2,167 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CR

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)