Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2412.14244

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2412.14244 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 18 Dec 2024 (v1), last revised 18 May 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Blinded Mock Data Challenge for Gravitational-Wave Cosmology-I: Assessing the Robustness of Methods Using Binary Black Holes Mass Spectrum

Authors:Aman Agarwal, Ulyana Dupletsa, Konstantin Leyde, Suvodip Mukherjee, Benoit Revenu, Juan Esteban Rivera, Antonio Enea Romano, Mohit Raj Sah, Sergio Vallejo-Pena, Adrian Avendano, Freija Beirnaert, Gergely Dalya, Miguel Cifuentes Espitia, Christos Karathanasis, Santiago Moreno-Gonzalez, Lucas Quiceno, Federico Stachurski, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Rachel Gray, Nicola Tamanini, Cezary Turski
View a PDF of the paper titled Blinded Mock Data Challenge for Gravitational-Wave Cosmology-I: Assessing the Robustness of Methods Using Binary Black Holes Mass Spectrum, by Aman Agarwal and 20 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Gravitational Wave (GW) sources are standard sirens that provide an independent way to map the cosmic expansion history by combining with an independent redshift measurement either from an electromagnetic counterpart for a bright siren or using different statistical techniques for dark sirens. In this analysis, we perform the first Blinded Mock Data Challenge (\texttt{Blinded-MDC}) to test the robustness in inferring the value of Hubble constant $H_0$ for a dark siren technique which depends on astrophysical mass distribution of Binary Black Holes (BBHs). We have considered different analysis setups for the \texttt{Blinded-MDC} to test both statistical and systematic uncertainties and demonstrate the capabilities in inferring $H_0$ with detector sensitivity as per the fourth observation run of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA. We find that when the astrophysical population of BBHs matches with the underlying assumption of the model, a cosmological pipeline can recover the injected parameters using the observed mass distribution. However, when the mock mass distribution of the astrophysical population depends slightly on redshift and one is ignorant about it in analyzing the data, it can cause a systematic discrepancy in the inferred value of $H_0$ by about $1.5\sigma$, above the statistical fluctuations due to noise and a limited number of events. In the future, elaborate studies will be required to mitigate systematic uncertainties due to unknown astrophysical complexities. This MDC framework sets the road map for inspecting the precision and accuracy of standard siren cosmology and provides the first insight into the robustness of the population-dependent cosmology inference in a blinded analysis setup.
Comments: 20 pages (+ 12 pages appendices) and 20 figures (+ 10 figures in appendices). Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:2412.14244 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2412.14244v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.14244
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Suvodip Mukherjee [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:00:01 UTC (20,292 KB)
[v2] Sun, 18 May 2025 18:22:19 UTC (41,279 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Blinded Mock Data Challenge for Gravitational-Wave Cosmology-I: Assessing the Robustness of Methods Using Binary Black Holes Mass Spectrum, by Aman Agarwal and 20 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-12
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA
astro-ph.HE
gr-qc

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack