Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2412.13348

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:2412.13348 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Dec 2024]

Title:Improving essay peer grading accuracy in MOOCs using personalized weights from student's engagement and performance

Authors:Carlos García-Martínez, Rebeca Cerezo, Manuel Bermúdez, Cristóbal Romero
View a PDF of the paper titled Improving essay peer grading accuracy in MOOCs using personalized weights from student's engagement and performance, by Carlos Garc\'ia-Mart\'inez and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Most MOOC platforms either use simple schemes for aggregating peer grades, e.g., taking the mean or the median, or apply methodologies that increase students' workload considerably, such as calibrated peer review. To reduce the error between the instructor and students' aggregated scores in the simple schemes, without requiring demanding grading calibration phases, some proposals compute specific weights to compute a weighted aggregation of the peer grades. In this work, and in contrast to most previous studies, we analyse the use of students' engagement and performance measures to compute personalized weights and study the validity of the aggregated scores produced by these common functions, mean and median, together with two other from the information retrieval field, namely the geometric and harmonic means. To test this procedure we have analysed data from a MOOC about Philosophy. The course had 1059 students registered, and 91 participated in a peer review process that consisted in writing an essay and rating three of their peers using a rubric. We calculated and compared the aggregation scores obtained using weighted and non-weighted versions. Our results show that the validity of the aggregated scores and their correlation with the instructors grades can be improved in relation to peer grading, when using the median and weights are computed according to students' performance in chapter tests.
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2412.13348 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:2412.13348v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.13348
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: JCAL, 35(1), 110-120 (2019)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12316
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Cristobal Romero [view email]
[v1] Tue, 17 Dec 2024 21:50:47 UTC (401 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Improving essay peer grading accuracy in MOOCs using personalized weights from student's engagement and performance, by Carlos Garc\'ia-Mart\'inez and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CY
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-12
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack