close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2412.11417

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2412.11417 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Dec 2024 (v1), last revised 17 Dec 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:RL-LLM-DT: An Automatic Decision Tree Generation Method Based on RL Evaluation and LLM Enhancement

Authors:Junjie Lin, Jian Zhao, Lin Liu, Yue Deng, Youpeng Zhao, Lanxiao Huang, Xia Lin, Wengang Zhou, Houqiang Li
View a PDF of the paper titled RL-LLM-DT: An Automatic Decision Tree Generation Method Based on RL Evaluation and LLM Enhancement, by Junjie Lin and 8 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Traditionally, AI development for two-player zero-sum games has relied on two primary techniques: decision trees and reinforcement learning (RL). A common approach involves using a fixed decision tree as one player's strategy while training an RL agent as the opponent to identify vulnerabilities in the decision tree, thereby improving its strategic strength iteratively. However, this process often requires significant human intervention to refine the decision tree after identifying its weaknesses, resulting in inefficiencies and hindering full automation of the strategy enhancement process. Fortunately, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers a transformative opportunity to automate the process. We propose RL-LLM-DT, an automatic decision tree generation method based on RL Evaluation and LLM Enhancement. Given an initial decision tree, the method involves two important iterative steps. Response Policy Search: RL is used to discover counter-strategies targeting the decision tree. Policy Improvement: LLMs analyze failure scenarios and generate improved decision tree code. In our method, RL focuses on finding the decision tree's flaws while LLM is prompted to generate an improved version of the decision tree. The iterative refinement process terminates when RL can't find any flaw of the tree or LLM fails to improve the tree. To evaluate the effectiveness of this integrated approach, we conducted experiments in a curling game. After iterative refinements, our curling AI based on the decision tree ranks first on the Jidi platform among 34 curling AIs in total, which demonstrates that LLMs can significantly enhance the robustness and adaptability of decision trees, representing a substantial advancement in the field of Game AI. Our code is available at this https URL.
Comments: Length:10 pages. Figures:10 figures. Additional Notes:In this paper, we have introduced a novel hybrid approach which leverages the strengths of both RL and LLMs to itera- tively refine decision tree tactics, enhancing their performance and adaptability
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
MSC classes: 68T05
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.11
Cite as: arXiv:2412.11417 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2412.11417v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.11417
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Junjie Lin [view email]
[v1] Mon, 16 Dec 2024 03:33:49 UTC (635 KB)
[v2] Tue, 17 Dec 2024 04:04:12 UTC (635 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled RL-LLM-DT: An Automatic Decision Tree Generation Method Based on RL Evaluation and LLM Enhancement, by Junjie Lin and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack