Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2412.10966

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2412.10966 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 Dec 2024 (v1), last revised 24 Mar 2025 (this version, v3)]

Title:FlowDock: Geometric Flow Matching for Generative Protein-Ligand Docking and Affinity Prediction

Authors:Alex Morehead, Jianlin Cheng
View a PDF of the paper titled FlowDock: Geometric Flow Matching for Generative Protein-Ligand Docking and Affinity Prediction, by Alex Morehead and Jianlin Cheng
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Powerful generative AI models of protein-ligand structure have recently been proposed, but few of these methods support both flexible protein-ligand docking and affinity estimation. Of those that do, none can directly model multiple binding ligands concurrently or have been rigorously benchmarked on pharmacologically relevant drug targets, hindering their widespread adoption in drug discovery efforts. In this work, we propose FlowDock, the first deep geometric generative model based on conditional flow matching that learns to directly map unbound (apo) structures to their bound (holo) counterparts for an arbitrary number of binding ligands. Furthermore, FlowDock provides predicted structural confidence scores and binding affinity values with each of its generated protein-ligand complex structures, enabling fast virtual screening of new (multi-ligand) drug targets. For the well-known PoseBusters Benchmark dataset, FlowDock outperforms single-sequence AlphaFold 3 with a 51% blind docking success rate using unbound (apo) protein input structures and without any information derived from multiple sequence alignments, and for the challenging new DockGen-E dataset, FlowDock outperforms single-sequence AlphaFold 3 and matches single-sequence Chai-1 for binding pocket generalization. Additionally, in the ligand category of the 16th community-wide Critical Assessment of Techniques for Structure Prediction (CASP16), FlowDock ranked among the top-5 methods for pharmacological binding affinity estimation across 140 protein-ligand complexes, demonstrating the efficacy of its learned representations in virtual screening. Source code, data, and pre-trained models are available at this https URL.
Comments: 15 pages, 2 tables, 2 algorithms, 11 figures. Code, data, pre-trained models, and baseline method predictions are available at this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Biomolecules (q-bio.BM); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
ACM classes: I.2.1; J.3
Cite as: arXiv:2412.10966 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2412.10966v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.10966
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Alex Morehead [view email]
[v1] Sat, 14 Dec 2024 20:54:37 UTC (4,280 KB)
[v2] Wed, 15 Jan 2025 21:20:03 UTC (5,065 KB)
[v3] Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:50:30 UTC (19,721 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled FlowDock: Geometric Flow Matching for Generative Protein-Ligand Docking and Affinity Prediction, by Alex Morehead and Jianlin Cheng
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
q-bio
q-bio.BM
q-bio.QM

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack