Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2411.14122

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Fluid Dynamics

arXiv:2411.14122 (physics)
[Submitted on 21 Nov 2024]

Title:From underground natural gas to hydrogen storage in fractured reservoir rock : comparing relative permeabilities for hydrogen versus methane and nitrogen

Authors:Sojwal Manoorkar, Gülce Kalyoncu Pakkaner, Hamdi Omar, Soetkin Barbaix, Dominique Ceursters, Maxime Lathinis, Stefanie Van Offenwert, Tom Bultreys
View a PDF of the paper titled From underground natural gas to hydrogen storage in fractured reservoir rock : comparing relative permeabilities for hydrogen versus methane and nitrogen, by Sojwal Manoorkar and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Underground hydrogen storage in saline aquifers is a potential solution for seasonal renewable energy storage. Among potential storage sites, facilities used for underground natural gas storage have advantages, including well-characterized cyclical injection-withdrawal behavior and partially reusable infrastructure. However, the differences between hydrogen-brine and natural gas-brine flow, particularly through fractures in the reservoir and the sealing caprock, remain unclear due to the complexity of two-phase flow. Therefore, we investigate fracture relative permeability for hydrogen versus methane (natural gas) and nitrogen (commonly used in laboratories). Steady-state relative permeability experiments were conducted at 10 MPa on fractured carbonate rock from the Loenhout natural gas storage in Belgium, where gas flows through {\textmu}m-to-mm scale fractures. Our results reveal that the hydrogen exhibits similar relative permeability curves to methane, but both are significantly lower than those measured for nitrogen. This implies that nitrogen cannot reliably serve as a proxy for hydrogen at typical reservoir pressures. The low relative permeabilities for hydrogen and methane indicate strong fluid phase interference, which traditional relative permeability models fail to capture. This is supported by our observation of periodic pressure fluctuations associated with intermittent fluid connectivity for hydrogen and methane. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the fundamental flow properties of fractured rocks are complex but relatively similar for hydrogen and natural gas. This is an important insight for predictive modeling of the conversion of Loenhout and similar natural gas storage facilities, which is crucial to evaluate their hydrogen storage efficiency and integrity.
Comments: 58 pages, 24 figures
Subjects: Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)
Cite as: arXiv:2411.14122 [physics.flu-dyn]
  (or arXiv:2411.14122v1 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.14122
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Sojwal Manoorkar [view email]
[v1] Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:46:56 UTC (31,587 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled From underground natural gas to hydrogen storage in fractured reservoir rock : comparing relative permeabilities for hydrogen versus methane and nitrogen, by Sojwal Manoorkar and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.flu-dyn
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack