Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:2411.12923 (cs)
[Submitted on 19 Nov 2024]

Title:Towards Automated Verification of Logarithmic Arithmetic

Authors:Mark G. Arnold, Thomas A. Bailey, John R. Cowles
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Correctness proofs for floating point programs are difficult to verify. To simplify the task, a similar, but less complex system, known as logarithmic arithmetic can be used. The Boyer-Moore Theorem Prover, NQTHM, mechanically verified the correctness of a simple implementation of logarithmic arithmetic. It also verified some useful theorems about accumulated relative error bounds for addition, multiplication and division in this logarithmic number system. These theorems were used to verify a program that approximates e^x using a truncated Taylor series. Axioms that characterize the finite precision of the logarithmic system using a rational base, b, were shown by the prover to be satisfiable for any choice of 1 < b < 2. The prover verified the correctness of a function for converting an arbitrary rational value to a logarithmic representation. It also verified that multiplication and division implementations produce exact results for exact inputs, and that addition implementation produces a result as accurate as possible for exact inputs. When these operations are used in combination by a program, such as evaluating a polynomial, the relative error increases in a way that can be bounded by simple expressions, referred to here as tolerances. Several mechanically verified theorems about tolerances allow us to construct mechanically verified proofs about logarithmic arithmetic programs. Although similar to interval arithmetic, tolerances are especially suited to logarithmic arithmetic.
Comments: 21 pages, Originally a 1994 technical report from University of Wyoming and Computational Logic, Inc
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Hardware Architecture (cs.AR)
ACM classes: B.2
Cite as: arXiv:2411.12923 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:2411.12923v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.12923

Submission history

From: Mark Arnold [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:21:20 UTC (19 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AR

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)