Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2411.12061

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

arXiv:2411.12061 (eess)
[Submitted on 18 Nov 2024 (v1), last revised 25 Nov 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Deep Learning-Based Prediction of PET Amyloid Status Using Multi-Contrast MRI

Authors:Donghoon Kim, Jon Andre Ottesen, Ashwin Kumar, Brandon C. Ho, Elsa Bismuth, Christina B. Young, Elizabeth Mormino, Greg Zaharchuk (for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative)
View a PDF of the paper titled Deep Learning-Based Prediction of PET Amyloid Status Using Multi-Contrast MRI, by Donghoon Kim and 7 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Identifying amyloid-beta positive patients is crucial for determining eligibility for Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials and new disease-modifying treatments, but currently requires PET or CSF sampling. Previous MRI-based deep learning models for predicting amyloid positivity, using only T1w sequences, have shown moderate performance. We trained deep learning models to predict amyloid PET positivity and evaluated whether multi-contrast inputs improve performance. A total of 4,058 exams with multi-contrast MRI and PET-based quantitative amyloid deposition were obtained from three public datasets: the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies 3 (OASIS3), and the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4). Two separate EfficientNet models were trained for amyloid positivity prediction: one with only T1w images and the other with both T1w and T2-FLAIR images as network inputs. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined using an internal held-out test set. The trained models were further evaluated using an external test set. In the held-out test sets, the T1w and T1w+T2FLAIR models demonstrated AUCs of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.64) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.70) (p = 0.006); accuracies were 61% (95% CI: 60%, 63%) and 64% (95% CI: 62%, 66%) (p = 0.008); sensitivities were 0.88 and 0.71; and specificities were 0.23 and 0.53, respectively. The trained models showed similar performance in the external test set. Performance of the current model on both test sets exceeded that of the publicly available model. In conclusion, the use of multi-contrast MRI, specifically incorporating T2-FLAIR in addition to T1w images, significantly improved the predictive accuracy of PET-determined amyloid status from MRI scans using a deep learning approach.
Comments: 18 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)
Cite as: arXiv:2411.12061 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2411.12061v2 [eess.IV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.12061
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Donghoon Kim [view email]
[v1] Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:01:41 UTC (2,596 KB)
[v2] Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:49:27 UTC (2,602 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Deep Learning-Based Prediction of PET Amyloid Status Using Multi-Contrast MRI, by Donghoon Kim and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
eess.IV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack