close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2411.09704

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Computational Physics

arXiv:2411.09704 (physics)
[Submitted on 29 Oct 2024]

Title:From Mesh to Neural Nets: A Multi-Method Evaluation of Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations

Authors:Fardous Hasan, Hazrat Ali, Hasan Asyari Arief
View a PDF of the paper titled From Mesh to Neural Nets: A Multi-Method Evaluation of Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations, by Fardous Hasan and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Non-linear convection-reaction-diffusion (CRD) partial differential equations (PDEs) are crucial for modeling complex phenomena in fields such as biology, ecology, population dynamics, physics, and engineering. Numerical approximation of these non-linear systems is essential due to the challenges of obtaining exact solutions. Traditionally, the Galerkin finite element method (GFEM) has been the standard computational tool for solving these PDEs. With the advancements in machine learning, Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) has emerged as a promising alternative for approximating non-linear PDEs.
In this study, we compare the performance of PINN and GFEM by solving four distinct one-dimensional CRD problems with varying initial and boundary conditions and evaluate the performance of PINN over GFEM. This evaluation metrics includes error estimates, and visual representations of the solutions, supported by statistical methods such as the root mean squared error (RMSE), the standard deviation of error, the the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test and the coefficient of variation (CV) test.
Our findings reveal that while both methods achieve solutions close to the analytical results, PINN demonstrate superior accuracy and efficiency. PINN achieved significantly lower RMSE values and smaller standard deviations for Burgers' equation, Fisher's equation, and Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, indicating higher accuracy and greater consistency. While GFEM shows slightly better accuracy for the Burgers-Huxley equation, its performance was less consistent over time. In contrast, PINN exhibit more reliable and robust performance, highlighting their potential as a cutting-edge approach for solving non-linear PDEs.
Comments: 29 pages, 13 figures
Subjects: Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)
Cite as: arXiv:2411.09704 [physics.comp-ph]
  (or arXiv:2411.09704v1 [physics.comp-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.09704
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-025-01904-y
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Fardous Hasan [view email]
[v1] Tue, 29 Oct 2024 19:31:49 UTC (2,950 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled From Mesh to Neural Nets: A Multi-Method Evaluation of Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations, by Fardous Hasan and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.comp-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.NA
math
math.NA
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack