Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2411.02484

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

arXiv:2411.02484 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 4 Nov 2024 (v1), last revised 12 Dec 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Not just winds: why models find binary black hole formation is metallicity dependent, while binary neutron star formation is not

Authors:L. A. C. van Son, S. K. Roy, I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, A. Lam, J. Merritt, F. S. Broekgaarden, A. Sander, J. J. Andrews
View a PDF of the paper titled Not just winds: why models find binary black hole formation is metallicity dependent, while binary neutron star formation is not, by L. A. C. van Son and 8 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Both detailed and rapid population studies alike predict that binary black hole (BHBH) formation is orders of magnitude more efficient at low metallicity than high metallicity, while binary neutron star (NSNS) formation remains mostly flat with metallicity, and black hole-neutron star (BHNS) mergers show intermediate behavior. This finding is a key input to employ double compact objects as tracers of low-metallicity star formation, as spectral sirens, and for merger rate calculations. Yet, the literature offers various (sometimes contradicting) explanations for these trends. We investigate the dominant cause for the metallicity dependence of double compact object formation. We find that the BHBH formation efficiency at low metallicity is set by initial condition distributions, and conventional simulations suggest that about \textit{one in eight interacting binary systems} with sufficient mass to form black holes will lead to a merging BHBH. We further find that the significance of metallicities in double compact object formation is a question of formation channel. The stable mass transfer and chemically homogeneous evolution channels mainly diminish at high metallicities due to changes in stellar radii, while the common envelope channel is primarily impacted by the combined effects of stellar winds and mass-scaled natal kicks. Outdated giant wind prescriptions exacerbate the latter effect, suggesting BHBH formation may be much less metallicity dependent than previously assumed. NSNS formation efficiency remains metallicity independent as they form exclusively through the common envelope channel, with natal kicks that are assumed uncorrelated with mass. Forthcoming GW observations will provide valuable constraints on these findings.
Comments: 15 pages, 8 Figures, Submitted to ApJ, Scripts and data to reproduce this work are at this https URL , and this https URL
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:2411.02484 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:2411.02484v2 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.02484
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Lieke Van Son [view email]
[v1] Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:00:00 UTC (596 KB)
[v2] Thu, 12 Dec 2024 15:31:07 UTC (599 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Not just winds: why models find binary black hole formation is metallicity dependent, while binary neutron star formation is not, by L. A. C. van Son and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack