close this message
arXiv smileybones

Happy Open Access Week from arXiv!

YOU make open access possible! Tell us why you support #openaccess and give to arXiv this week to help keep science open for all.

Donate!
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2411.00818

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2411.00818 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Oct 2024 (v1), last revised 28 Nov 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:On the Black-box Explainability of Object Detection Models for Safe and Trustworthy Industrial Applications

Authors:Alain Andres, Aitor Martinez-Seras, Ibai Laña, Javier Del Ser
View a PDF of the paper titled On the Black-box Explainability of Object Detection Models for Safe and Trustworthy Industrial Applications, by Alain Andres and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In the realm of human-machine interaction, artificial intelligence has become a powerful tool for accelerating data modeling tasks. Object detection methods have achieved outstanding results and are widely used in critical domains like autonomous driving and video surveillance. However, their adoption in high-risk applications, where errors may cause severe consequences, remains limited. Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods aim to address this issue, but many existing techniques are model-specific and designed for classification tasks, making them less effective for object detection and difficult for non-specialists to interpret. In this work we focus on model-agnostic explainability methods for object detection models and propose D-MFPP, an extension of the Morphological Fragmental Perturbation Pyramid (MFPP) technique based on segmentation-based masks to generate explanations. Additionally, we introduce D-Deletion, a novel metric combining faithfulness and localization, adapted specifically to meet the unique demands of object detectors. We evaluate these methods on real-world industrial and robotic datasets, examining the influence of parameters such as the number of masks, model size, and image resolution on the quality of explanations. Our experiments use single-stage object detection models applied to two safety-critical robotic environments: i) a shared human-robot workspace where safety is of paramount importance, and ii) an assembly area of battery kits, where safety is critical due to the potential for damage among high-risk components. Our findings evince that D-Deletion effectively gauges the performance of explanations when multiple elements of the same class appear in a scene, while D-MFPP provides a promising alternative to D-RISE when fewer masks are used.
Comments: 14 pages, 10 figures, 6 tables
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2411.00818 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2411.00818v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00818
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Volume 24, Year 2024, Page number 103498
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103498
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Alain Andres [view email]
[v1] Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:28:05 UTC (2,949 KB)
[v2] Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:09:26 UTC (2,949 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled On the Black-box Explainability of Object Detection Models for Safe and Trustworthy Industrial Applications, by Alain Andres and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status