close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2411.00112

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2411.00112 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 Oct 2024 (v1), last revised 18 Feb 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Derivative-Free Optimization via Finite Difference Approximation: An Experimental Study

Authors:Wang Du-Yi, Liang Guo, Liu Guangwu, Zhang Kun
View a PDF of the paper titled Derivative-Free Optimization via Finite Difference Approximation: An Experimental Study, by Wang Du-Yi and Liang Guo and Liu Guangwu and Zhang Kun
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Derivative-free optimization (DFO) is vital in solving complex optimization problems where only noisy function evaluations are available through an oracle. Within this domain, DFO via finite difference (FD) approximation has emerged as a powerful method. Two classical approaches are the Kiefer-Wolfowitz (KW) and simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) algorithms, which estimate gradients using just two samples in each iteration to conserve samples. However, this approach yields imprecise gradient estimators, necessitating diminishing step sizes to ensure convergence, often resulting in slow optimization progress. In contrast, FD estimators constructed from batch samples approximate gradients more accurately. While gradient descent algorithms using batch-based FD estimators achieve more precise results in each iteration, they require more samples and permit fewer iterations. This raises a fundamental question: which approach is more effective -- KW-style methods or DFO with batch-based FD estimators? This paper conducts a comprehensive experimental comparison among these approaches, examining the fundamental trade-off between gradient estimation accuracy and iteration steps. Through extensive experiments in both low-dimensional and high-dimensional settings, we demonstrate a surprising finding: when an efficient batch-based FD estimator is applied, its corresponding gradient descent algorithm generally shows better performance compared to classical KW and SPSA algorithms in our tested scenarios.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
MSC classes: 90-05
ACM classes: I.6.1; I.6.6
Cite as: arXiv:2411.00112 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2411.00112v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00112
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kun Zhang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:07:44 UTC (1,443 KB)
[v2] Tue, 18 Feb 2025 01:29:21 UTC (1,523 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Derivative-Free Optimization via Finite Difference Approximation: An Experimental Study, by Wang Du-Yi and Liang Guo and Liu Guangwu and Zhang Kun
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-11
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.OC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack