Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2410.23792

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

arXiv:2410.23792 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 Oct 2024 (v1), last revised 21 Nov 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Bibliometrics effects of a new item-by-item classification system based on reference reclassification

Authors:Marcos Pena-Rocha, Maria Rocio Gomez-Crisostomo, Vicente Pablo Guerrero-Bote, Felix de Moya-Anegon
View a PDF of the paper titled Bibliometrics effects of a new item-by-item classification system based on reference reclassification, by Marcos Pena-Rocha and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:This study presents a comparative analysis between two scientific document classification systems. The first system employs the Scopus journal-based assignment method, adapted to a fractional model, while the second system uses an item-by-item system based on reclassified references according to the origin of the citers. The study's results are divided into three different sections: the first involves comparisons at the Scopus area level, the second examines comparisons at the category level, and the third tests various bibliometric indicators to identify the variations between the two systems. Highlighting the characteristics of the paper level system, it offers a reduction in the number of categories to which each document is assigned, achieving higher values of single-category assignment compared to the All Science Journal Classification (ASJC). When reclassifying areas and categories, the paper level system tends to accentuate differences at the extreme values, increasing the size of the largest categories and reducing that of the smallest ones. Moreover, the paper-by-paper system provides more homogeneous distributions in normalised impacts and adjusts values related to excellence more uniformly.
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL)
Cite as: arXiv:2410.23792 [cs.DL]
  (or arXiv:2410.23792v2 [cs.DL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.23792
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Vicente Pablo Guerrero Bote [view email]
[v1] Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:25:22 UTC (523 KB)
[v2] Thu, 21 Nov 2024 11:19:46 UTC (2,503 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Bibliometrics effects of a new item-by-item classification system based on reference reclassification, by Marcos Pena-Rocha and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.DL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack