Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 25 Sep 2024 (v1), last revised 29 Mar 2025 (this version, v2)]
Title:Monge-Kantorovich Fitting With Sobolev Budgets
View PDFAbstract:Given $m < n$, we consider the problem of ``best'' approximating an $n\text{-d}$ probability measure $\rho$ via an $m\text{-d}$ measure $\nu$ such that $\mathrm{supp}\ \nu$ has bounded total ``complexity.'' When $\rho$ is concentrated near an $m\text{-d}$ set we may interpret this as a manifold learning problem with noisy data. However, we do not restrict our analysis to this case, as the more general formulation has broader applications.
We quantify $\nu$'s performance in approximating $\rho$ via the Monge-Kantorovich (also called Wasserstein) $p$-cost $\mathbb{W}_p^p(\rho, \nu)$, and constrain the complexity by requiring $\mathrm{supp}\ \nu$ to be coverable by an $f : \mathbb{R}^{m} \to \mathbb{R}^{n}$ whose $W^{k,q}$ Sobolev norm is bounded by $\ell \geq 0$. This allows us to reformulate the problem as minimizing a functional $\mathscr J_p(f)$ under the Sobolev ``budget'' $\ell$. This problem is closely related to (but distinct from) principal curves with length constraints when $m=1, k = 1$ and an unsupervised analogue of smoothing splines when $k > 1$. New challenges arise from the higher-order differentiability condition.
We study the ``gradient'' of $\mathscr J_p$, which is given by a certain vector field that we call the barycenter field, and use it to prove a nontrivial (almost) strict monotonicity result. We also provide a natural discretization scheme and establish its consistency. We use this scheme as a toy model for a generative learning task, and by analogy, propose novel interpretations for the role regularization plays in improving training.
Submission history
From: Forest Kobayashi [view email][v1] Wed, 25 Sep 2024 01:30:16 UTC (25,903 KB)
[v2] Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:57:44 UTC (8,124 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.