Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2409.11525v5

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2409.11525v5 (stat)
[Submitted on 17 Sep 2024 (v1), revised 4 Dec 2024 (this version, v5), latest version 4 May 2025 (v7)]

Title:Interpretability Indices and Soft Constraints for Factor Models

Authors:Justin Philip Tuazon, Gia Mizrane Abubo, Joemari Olea
View a PDF of the paper titled Interpretability Indices and Soft Constraints for Factor Models, by Justin Philip Tuazon and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Factor analysis is a way to characterize the relationships between many observable variables in terms of a smaller number of unobservable random variables. However, the application of factor models and its success can be subjective or difficult to gauge, since the factor model is not identifiable. Thus, there is a need to operationalize a criterion that measures how meaningful or "interpretable" a factor model is. While there are already techniques that address interpretability, new indices and methods are proposed to measure interpretability. The proposed methods can directly incorporate both loadings and semantics, and are generalized to incorporate any "prior information". Moreover, the indices allow for complete or partial specification of relationships at a pairwise level. Two other main benefits of the proposed methods are that they do not require the estimation of factor scores, which avoids the factor score indeterminacy problem, and that no additional explanatory variables are necessary. The implementation of the proposed methods is written in Python 3 and is made available together with several helper functions through the package interpretablefa on the Python Package Index. The methods' application is demonstrated here using data on the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale, obtained from the Open-Source Psychometrics Project.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2409.11525 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2409.11525v5 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.11525
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Justin Philip Tuazon [view email]
[v1] Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:50:01 UTC (1,597 KB)
[v2] Thu, 19 Sep 2024 03:23:14 UTC (1,597 KB)
[v3] Sun, 22 Sep 2024 14:01:09 UTC (1,601 KB)
[v4] Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:01:46 UTC (3,189 KB)
[v5] Wed, 4 Dec 2024 02:28:32 UTC (3,189 KB)
[v6] Sun, 29 Dec 2024 03:39:05 UTC (1,634 KB)
[v7] Sun, 4 May 2025 18:30:51 UTC (1,534 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Interpretability Indices and Soft Constraints for Factor Models, by Justin Philip Tuazon and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-09
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack