close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > gr-qc > arXiv:2409.07298

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

arXiv:2409.07298 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 11 Sep 2024 (v1), last revised 17 Sep 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:What is the nature of GW230529? An exploration of the gravitational lensing hypothesis

Authors:Justin Janquart, David Keitel, Rico K. L. Lo, Juno C. L. Chan, Jose Marìa Ezquiaga, Otto A. Hannuksela, Alvin K. Y. Li, Anupreeta More, Hemantakumar Phurailatpam, Neha Singh, Laura E. Uronen, Mick Wright, Naresh Adhikari, Sylvia Biscoveanu, Tomasz Bulik, Amanda M. Farah, Anna Heffernan, Prathamesh Joshi, Vincent Juste, Atul Kedia, Shania A. Nichols, Geraint Pratten, C. Rawcliffe, Soumen Roy, Elise M. Sänger, Hui Tong, M. Trevor, Luka Vujeva, Michael Zevin
View a PDF of the paper titled What is the nature of GW230529? An exploration of the gravitational lensing hypothesis, by Justin Janquart and 28 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:On the 29th of May 2023, the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration observed a compact binary coalescence event consistent with a neutron star-black hole merger, though the heavier object of mass 2.5-4.5 $M_\odot$ would fall into the purported lower mass gap. An alternative explanation for apparent observations of events in this mass range has been suggested as strongly gravitationally lensed binary neutron stars. In this scenario, magnification would lead to the source appearing closer and heavier than it really is. Here, we investigate the chances and possible consequences for the GW230529 event to be gravitationally lensed. We find this would require high magnifications and we obtain low rates for observing such an event, with a relative fraction of lensed versus unlensed observed events of $2 \times 10^{-3}$ at most. When comparing the lensed and unlensed hypotheses accounting for the latest rates and population model, we find a 1/58 chance of lensing, disfavoring this option. Moreover, when the magnification is assumed to be strong enough to bring the mass of the heavier binary component below the standard limits on neutron star masses, we find high probability for the lighter object to have a sub-solar mass, making the binary even more exotic than a mass-gap neutron star-black hole system. Even when the secondary is not sub-solar, its tidal deformability would likely be measurable, which is not the case for GW230529. Finally, we do not find evidence for extra lensing signatures such as the arrival of additional lensed images, type-II image dephasing, or microlensing. Therefore, we conclude it is unlikely for GW230529 to be a strongly gravitationally lensed binary neutron star signal.
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Report number: LIGO-P2400353
Cite as: arXiv:2409.07298 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:2409.07298v2 [gr-qc] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.07298
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Justin Janquart [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:30:28 UTC (3,138 KB)
[v2] Tue, 17 Sep 2024 06:54:26 UTC (4,948 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled What is the nature of GW230529? An exploration of the gravitational lensing hypothesis, by Justin Janquart and 28 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
gr-qc
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.HE

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack