Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2408.16705

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Fluid Dynamics

arXiv:2408.16705 (physics)
[Submitted on 29 Aug 2024 (v1), last revised 21 Mar 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Experimental validation of a linear momentum and bluff-body model for high-blockage cross-flow turbine arrays

Authors:Aidan Hunt, Ari Athair, Owen Williams, Brian Polagye
View a PDF of the paper titled Experimental validation of a linear momentum and bluff-body model for high-blockage cross-flow turbine arrays, by Aidan Hunt and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In a confined flow, the performance of a turbine and its near-wake fluid dynamics depend on the blockage ratio, defined as the ratio of the turbine projected area to the channel cross-sectional area. While blockage is understood to increase the power coefficient for turbine "fences" spanning a channel, most investigations at the upper range of practically-achievable blockage ratios have been theoretical or numerical in nature. Furthermore, while linear momentum actuator disk theory is frequently used to model turbines in confined flows, as confinement increases, the ability of this idealized model to describe performance and flow fields has not been established. In this work, the performance and near-wake flow field of a pair of cross-flow turbines are experimentally evaluated at blockage ratios from 30% to 55%. The fluid velocity measured in the bypass region is found to be well-predicted by the open-channel linear momentum model developed by Houlsby et al. (2008), while the wake velocity is not. Additionally, self-similar power and thrust coefficients are identified across this range of blockage ratios when array performance is scaled by the modeled bypass velocity following Whelan et al.'s (2009) adaptation of the bluff-body theory of Maskell (1963). This result demonstrates that, despite multiple non-idealities, relatively simple models can quantitatively describe highly confined turbines. From this, an analytical method for predicting array performance as a function of blockage is presented. Overall, this work illustrates turbine performance at relatively high confinement and demonstrates the suitability of analytical models for predicting and interpreting their hydrodynamics.
Comments: SUBMITTED to Physical Review Fluids. Code supporting this manuscript is available on GitHub at this https URL. Data supporting this manuscript will soon be made available upon publication
Subjects: Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)
Cite as: arXiv:2408.16705 [physics.flu-dyn]
  (or arXiv:2408.16705v2 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16705
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Aidan Hunt [view email]
[v1] Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:59:38 UTC (26,299 KB)
[v2] Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:29:23 UTC (37,415 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Experimental validation of a linear momentum and bluff-body model for high-blockage cross-flow turbine arrays, by Aidan Hunt and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.flu-dyn
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-08
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack