Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2408.16093

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Instrumentation and Detectors

arXiv:2408.16093 (physics)
[Submitted on 28 Aug 2024 (v1), last revised 30 Aug 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Validation of Thin-foil proton recoil neutron spectrometer prototype for application in high yield DT fusion devices

Authors:B. Marcinkevicius, E. Andersson Sunden, G. Ericsson, A. Hjalmarsson
View a PDF of the paper titled Validation of Thin-foil proton recoil neutron spectrometer prototype for application in high yield DT fusion devices, by B. Marcinkevicius and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The use of Thin-foil Proton Recoil (TPR) spectrometers for application in neutron spectroscopy is of high relevance for future fusion devices such as ITER, where neutron spectroscopy will play a crucial role in fuel content monitoring. Existing research based on simulations of the performance of TPR spectrometers at ITER has demonstrated positive results. However, experimental validation of the simulations would greatly benefit the reliability of conclusions. In this study, we designed and constructed a prototype TPR neutron spectrometer and employed a DT neutron generator as a neutron source to perform measurements. We compared the experimental results with the simulation results using the Geant4 model of the experiment. The simulation and experimental results match within silicon detector intrinsic energy resolution. This approach ensures the experimental validation of the Geant4 based simulations of the TPR spectrometer. The experimental results demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing nuclear reactions measured in silicon detectors, specifically $^{28}$Si(n,d) and $^{28}$Si(n,$\alpha$), for energy calibration purposes. A comparison of the experiment and the simulation shows that the mean peak energy and full width at half maximum are within 150 keV. The calculated detector efficiency underestimates the experimentally determined efficiency up to 33\%. Discrepancies in the measured energy spectrum indicate the need for a more refined model and experiment control. Overall, the successful validation of the developed Geant4 simulation model against the experimentally measured energy spectra increases confidence in the applicability of such simulation results in other devices. The demonstrated energy calibration highlights new possibilities for neutron spectrometer monitoring during operation at ITER.
Comments: Corrected labels for figure 3
Subjects: Instrumentation and Detectors (physics.ins-det); Plasma Physics (physics.plasm-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2408.16093 [physics.ins-det]
  (or arXiv:2408.16093v2 [physics.ins-det] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16093
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Benjaminas Marcinkevicius [view email]
[v1] Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:49:38 UTC (9,433 KB)
[v2] Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:24:40 UTC (9,437 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Validation of Thin-foil proton recoil neutron spectrometer prototype for application in high yield DT fusion devices, by B. Marcinkevicius and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.ins-det
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-08
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.plasm-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack