Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2407.16258

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Information Theory

arXiv:2407.16258 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Jul 2024]

Title:Telecommand Rejection Probability for CCSDS-compliant LDPC-Coded Transmissions with Tail Sequence

Authors:Rebecca Giuliani, Massimo Battaglioni, Marco Baldi, Franco Chiaraluce, Nicola Maturo
View a PDF of the paper titled Telecommand Rejection Probability for CCSDS-compliant LDPC-Coded Transmissions with Tail Sequence, by Rebecca Giuliani and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:According to the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) recommendation for TeleCommand (TC) synchronization and coding, the Communications Link Transmission Unit (CLTU) consists of a start sequence, followed by coded data, and a tail sequence, which might be optional depending on the employed coding scheme. With regard to the latter, these transmissions traditionally use a modified Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) code, to which two state-of-the-art Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes were later added. As a lightweight technique to detect the presence of the tail sequence, an approach based on decoding failure has traditionally been used, choosing a non-correctable string as the tail sequence. This works very well with the BCH code, for which bounded-distance decoders are employed. When the same approach is employed with LDPC codes, it is necessary to design the tail sequence as a non-correctable string for the case of iterative decoders based on belief propagation. Moreover, the tail sequence might be corrupted by noise, potentially converting it into a correctable pattern. It is therefore important that the tail sequence is chosen to be as much distant as possible, according to some metric, from any legitimate codeword. In this paper we study such problem, and analyze the TC rejection probability both theoretically and through simulations. Such a performance figure, being the rate at which the CLTU is discarded, should clearly be minimized. Our analysis is performed considering many different choices of the system parameters (e.g., length of the CLTU, decoding algorithm, maximum number of decoding iterations).
Subjects: Information Theory (cs.IT)
Cite as: arXiv:2407.16258 [cs.IT]
  (or arXiv:2407.16258v1 [cs.IT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.16258
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Massimo Battaglioni Dr. [view email]
[v1] Tue, 23 Jul 2024 07:51:01 UTC (51 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Telecommand Rejection Probability for CCSDS-compliant LDPC-Coded Transmissions with Tail Sequence, by Rebecca Giuliani and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.IT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-07
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.IT

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack