Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2406.14988

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

arXiv:2406.14988 (eess)
[Submitted on 21 Jun 2024]

Title:Introducing the Biomechanics-Function Relationship in Glaucoma: Improved Visual Field Loss Predictions from intraocular pressure-induced Neural Tissue Strains

Authors:Thanadet Chuangsuwanich, Monisha E. Nongpiur, Fabian A. Braeu, Tin A. Tun, Alexandre Thiery, Shamira Perera, Ching Lin Ho, Martin Buist, George Barbastathis, Tin Aung, Michaël J.A. Girard
View a PDF of the paper titled Introducing the Biomechanics-Function Relationship in Glaucoma: Improved Visual Field Loss Predictions from intraocular pressure-induced Neural Tissue Strains, by Thanadet Chuangsuwanich and 10 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Objective. (1) To assess whether neural tissue structure and biomechanics could predict functional loss in glaucoma; (2) To evaluate the importance of biomechanics in making such predictions. Design, Setting and Participants. We recruited 238 glaucoma subjects. For one eye of each subject, we imaged the optic nerve head (ONH) using spectral-domain OCT under the following conditions: (1) primary gaze and (2) primary gaze with acute IOP elevation. Main Outcomes: We utilized automatic segmentation of optic nerve head (ONH) tissues and digital volume correlation (DVC) analysis to compute intraocular pressure (IOP)-induced neural tissue strains. A robust geometric deep learning approach, known as Point-Net, was employed to predict the full Humphrey 24-2 pattern standard deviation (PSD) maps from ONH structural and biomechanical information. For each point in each PSD map, we predicted whether it exhibited no defect or a PSD value of less than 5%. Predictive performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and the F1-score. We compared the model's performance with and without the inclusion of IOP-induced strains to assess the impact of biomechanics on prediction accuracy. Results: Integrating biomechanical (IOP-induced neural tissue strains) and structural (tissue morphology and neural tissues thickness) information yielded a significantly better predictive model (F1-score: 0.76+-0.02) across validation subjects, as opposed to relying only on structural information, which resulted in a significantly lower F1-score of 0.71+-0.02 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study has shown that the integration of biomechanical data can significantly improve the accuracy of visual field loss predictions. This highlights the importance of the biomechanics-function relationship in glaucoma, and suggests that biomechanics may serve as a crucial indicator for the development and progression of glaucoma.
Comments: 19 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2406.14988 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2406.14988v1 [eess.IV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.14988
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michael Girard [view email]
[v1] Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:00:46 UTC (480 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Introducing the Biomechanics-Function Relationship in Glaucoma: Improved Visual Field Loss Predictions from intraocular pressure-induced Neural Tissue Strains, by Thanadet Chuangsuwanich and 10 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
eess.IV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack